
In a brilliant recent article in London’s Financial Times, ‘The Strange Death of Modern Advertising’, Maurice Saatchi stressed that in our media-diffracted, information-overloaded age brands must strive to build equity in a single word. “Each brand can only own one word. Each word can only be owned by one brand.” So what is Myer’s word? What equity can it own? What market space can it defend? What brand truth can it let shine through from within?
In the Australian retail space, David Jones unquestionably owns ‘fashion’ – to attempt a derivative of this positioning would be folly on the part of Myer, which has not been as single-minded as DJs in its brand-building of recent years (a malaise I’m afraid one catches by osmosis when your adopted parents for 21 years were from Tooronga, Victoria!).
Myer needs to build on its greater warmth and intimacy and its ‘My Store’ tag line and find a true connection with the audiences it serves and evoke this as a simple brand idea. It’s not too late, but it is too late to do nothing.
I’d recommend the same three-stage process we use whenever we’re engaged to articulate the truth behind the corporate brands we work on. Immerse. Articulate. Implement.
I’m guessing the original department store concept was to create a place where everyone could go to find everything they need. Today I think things have changed a lot and we now expect more from our brands; we are now looking for brands to come to us.
After five years in New York, I realised I could get anything I wanted from anywhere in the US within a day’s notice and, if it didn’t fit, I could just send it back.
I think Myer is in a great place to redefine the shopping experience for Australians. Not only in its appearance, but in the way it interacts with its shoppers. For example, Myer could unveil its new online store, open 24 hours Australia-wide. Like Google, Myer could become our shoppers’ search engine to the world’s best music, food and culture from fashion to homewares. This could then grow with the Generation Xs, as they gain greater spending power, offering fashion updates and interviews with Australian designers, musicians and writers. Myer could send fashion sales and updates on the web or straight to your phones.
I think Australia has some amazing creative influences. It would be great to have a department store that supports this on all levels. Myer could focus on representing a sense of realness through a relaxed environment, which is vibrant with colours and textures, in a move away from the formal marble and gold fitouts. Myer could move into spaces that reflect modern Australian architecture, inviting us to interact with each other and the space around us. Like Federation Square, Myer could use in-store displays to connect the in-store experience with the outside world.
With 10 years’ experience in brand design, I know that you can never lead by following, so with David Jones becoming recognised as a premium shopping experience and Target securing the entry level, it would make sense for Myer to build a reliable and honest brand that captures the hearts of the middle income earner, making the competition seem simply overpriced or just cheap.
Myer is an iconic Australian brand and I think it is important to nurture these brands to help shape the personality of our cities and capture our uniqueness, instead of becoming just another shopping mall. In this evolving environment Myer might need to take brave steps forward if it’s to associate itself with Australia’s progressive culture and the fashion industry.
Myer, I am excited to see the new you, good luck.
It’s never too late to revive an iconic brand like Myer. It’s a big job, however, and it requires a large investment. The first step is to ensure there’s the commitment from the new owners, and from the board.
The process for developing a new positioning for such a brand is far more structured than just emulating another successful brand’s positioning, such as in the case of David Jones. Myer needs to begin the process by outlining its business objectives and being able to answer the following questions:
Only when this is understood, should it begin to develop a relevant brand strategy and positioning. Whether Myer should muscle in on David Jones’ fashion positioning is dependent upon a number of criteria, including whether Myer’s product line-up can deliver on the fashion promise, now or in the future.
David Jones has invested well in its fashion strategy with the positioning and communications having run for years now. Its product lines meet its market’s promise, and it is well ahead of Myer.
And, while not quite in the same category, but close, Westfield has launched its biggest advertising campaign to date as part of its new, long-term fashion strategy.
It seems a single-minded fashion positioning is popular and, in my view, to replicate it would probably be a mistake. Myer needs to find its own unique identity, one that’s truly meaningful to its current and prospective customers. One that gets people in the stores and buying.
There are 60 Myer stores spread right across the country compared to 37 David Jones stores geared towards wealthy inner-urban locations. As long as the balance remains tipped in this way, DJs will always have a degree of scarcity and exclusivity on its side, and Myer will always play a greater role within the more price-sensitive mainstream.
We have seen much discussion about the potential for Myer to move ‘upmarket’; usually accompanied by the observation that a mainstream brand will struggle in the top end, which DJs now dominates. The solution is likely to come in the form of a hybrid model, and in future we should expect to see different tiers of Myer stores – emporiums perhaps restored to former glory, or suburban stores freed to focus on locally-relevant product.
The lack of competitor department store chains in Australia may narrow our thinking. But there are many international examples (Debenhams, BHS, Stockmann) where department stores have worked on multiple levels. Other clues to the future may come from the positioning of Target, Kmart and the larger fashion and homewares chains.
One significant trend in retail – as in so many sectors – is fragmentation into multiple niche markets. This presents a challenge to any department store, particularly one with mainstream real estate. But it can be done.
Obviously there’s a limit to the stretch that can be achieved under a single brand, so it’s quite conceivable that we might see another brand or diffusion line being introduced to cover concessions (or whole stores) where the Myer brand is no longer suitable. Myer’s Generation Y-orientated Basement concession is an example of this approach already in action.
With a footprint almost twice the size, Myer simply can’t be David Jones. Nor should it try to be. The relative success of DJ is seductive. But it would be a mistake to assume that Myer is compelled to pursue the same positioning. Ultimately, whether Myer becomes two brands or stays under a single name, the successful brand strategy will be one that explains why it it’s not like David Jones, and why it doesn’t need to be.
Perhaps it is the Sydney vs Melbourne thing but I adopted an underlaying anti Myer stance when they re-branded Grace Bros in 2004. I have no problem shopping at Myer in Melbourne but in Sydney I feel it is somehow wrong. I had not examined this subconscious aversion to Myer until now, and it confuses me because I never really had any special relationship with the Grace Bros brand. Perhaps there is something in all that brand equity stuff after all.
DJs has done what it does best and taken the fashion banner and marched into battle with Megan Gale playing the role of Joan of Arc. DJ's fashion events are magnificent, full scale, no expense spared affairs staged on a vast scale.
But each year Myer takes to the field and in August last year they had a major triumph by showcasing their spring and summer fashions to 16,000 people at a giant mock beach fashioned from 7 cubic meters of sand dumped in Martin Place in Sydney's CBD.
Myer's core business might be more mainstream fashion but the show itself and the designers featured, was high fashion and high theatre. Some thought it was the best fashion show they had ever seen - but did it make them want to go into Myer and buy the gear? "Oh God, Yes" said one convert.
Another proof that events are a powerful and effective tool in the marketing mix.
The fashion war between David Jones and Myer brings vitality to both brands. It would be a great shame if Myer were to withdraw and leave David Jones as the sole custodian of department store high fashion.
Retail land is doing it tough, and the almost continuous sales are not helping the shopping experience or margins. Prolonged poor results could lead to budget cuts, lower levels of service and a smaller range of goods on offer.
Myer is known for good levels of service and for selling the widest range of goods. Hopefully Myer will invest in the long term, retain service levels and let everyone else's standards slip, resulting in Myer gaining new customers by having the best service levels in an otherwise depleted market.
Perhaps Myer could re-brand as Grace Bros and sponsor a re-run of the "Are you being served" TV series to underpin their high levels of service? Just an idea.
The important factor of Awards initiative is that they are judged independently. Some awards seem to be fudged or spun with other motivations. A good panel of judges is the core of a good quality awards initiative.
1. The people that win them. They think that awards are a very important part of the industry.
2. The people that don't win them. They think that awards are an industry wank that seek to disguise the futility of their profession.
It can be a lot of fun for attendees, your choice...
The awards culture also tends to result in ads designed for the awards shows rather than the market the client operates in.
This work for charitable organisations and Not-For-Profit (NFP) companies is often seen as a surefire way to push the envelope and gain awards nominations for 'worthy' campaigns, but according to these adland types, agencies rarely get all warm and fuzzy about the prospect of pro-bono work.
In fact, some in agency land appear to actively resent giving away their time for free for causes, and that's not to even add the fact that the charities themselves are unlikely to get the top creative minds at the agency working on their case.
When do you think the big agency schedules in the pro bono charity? 4:30pm on a Friday, that's when.
So perhaps we should just check our admiration at the door when we hear about the next agency donating their time for the needy. Chances are the charity are getting pretty short shrift, and little real love from adland.
To have your say, login at the top of the page or register free and start commenting.