|
by The Newshoundon Sep 3 |
A study has found Australians will boycott organisations based on what they see on social networking sites.
The study, commissioned by RightNow Technologies and conducted by StollzNow Research, found that nearly a quarter (23%) of online Australians have boycotted a company after reading a negative comment on social media about how that organisation treats its customers.
Of those participating in the boycott, 42% said they had previously been a customer of the organisation.
According to the study, nearly a fifth (18%) of those polled have posted something about their poor customer experiences on Facebook, 11% have joined a group on Facebook opposed to the company in question, while others have Twittered, blogged or found negative videos on YouTube about the company and shared them with friends and family.
In every case, the top reason Australians took the action they did was to dissuade others from doing business with the organisation.
Commenting on the survey’s findings Brett Waters, RightNow’s vice president of Asia South Pacific, explained that the survey’s finding serve up a stark warning for all organisations, both commercial and public, that ignoring the viral nature of the social web can be detrimental to revenue and popularity.
“Any executives considering what social networking sites mean to their business should take heed of the survey’s overriding message; consumers want you to interact with them through sites like Twitter. Organisations must take a considered approach, monitoring conversations so they can learn the where, when and how of positively influencing ‘badvocates’ and fostering further loyalty among advocates,” says Waters.
While the study revealled that negative consumer-to-consumer conversations or comments online can have a detrimental effect on consumer spending, it indicated that there is massive potential for organisations to interact with consumers through the social media to foster brand loyalty and to turn ‘badvocates’ into advocates.
Other findings from the report include:
You sub editor should be whipped.
Para 5: Australian's. Wrong.
Para 8: Revealled. Wrong.
Good pick up. Sometimes sub editors do need to be more careful and I won't give some 'we're so busy' excuse. I will say that, despite what some people assume, we are indeed human so mistakes will happen.
If you're ever free for a drink I'd be quite happy to argue over the spelling of 'revealled' which is the Australian spelling of 'revealed' ie, travelled, levelled etc.
Regards,
Matty Soccio
Deputy editor
Marketing magazine
http://www.coachonsale.net Coach outlet
http://www.coachonsale.net coach bags
http://www.coachonsale.net coach outlet store online
http://www.chanels.cc chanel bags
http://www.chanels.cc chanel online
http://www.chanels.cc chanel handbags
http://www.uselv.com louis vuitton outlet
http://www.uselv.com louis vuitton sale
http://www.uselv.com louis vuitton handbags
http://www.coachs.cc coach outlet
http://www.coachs.cc coach outlet store online
http://www.coachs.cc coach handbags