Infographic: Online display advertising effectiveness and use in Australia

Long dominated by execution performance metrics, the measurement of online ad effectiveness is shifting towards brand measures such as awareness, favourability or purchase intent, as advertisers seek to be more definitive about ROI.

So which form of display ads deliver? Research from Millward Brown found that rich display and video ads can be up to four times more effective at building brand measures than other formats. When combined, the two formats can be even more powerful, boosting brand favourability by 4.7% and purchase intent by 4.3% in tests conducted.

Video rated as the strongest stand-alone performer for three of the four brand metrics analysed, but for online ad awareness rich formats was the most effective generating a 5.6% uplift among the exposed group compared to the control group in the study.

The frequency of exposure to display ads also plays an important role, with higher frequency not a positive thing in all cases, the study found. Video formats were found to be stronger performers at lower rather than higher frequencies, particularly for brand favourability and purchase intent measures. In fact, over-exposure to high impact formats can drive down attitudes toward a brand, particularly purchase intent.

Read more about the most effective exposure frequency for different formats and more about the study here.

A constant brand and message presence in the ads showed clear benefits, with awareness, favourability and purchase intent measures more than double for those with 100% logo presence over those with only partial presence. A similar trend was noted for ads with 100% message presence compared to partial message presence.

The days of solely measuring online campaign success on a cost per click or lead-generation basis are fading, says director of Millward Brown’s media and digital solutions, Mark Henning, with these measures indicating engagement with the ad itself rather than its success in improving brand metrics.

The below infographic, developed by Marketing, sources data from Millward Brown case study analysis, PricewaterhouseCoopers’ IAB Online Advertising Expenditure Report, March 2012, analysis of MediaMind’s ad network and Mi9.

Click image for full size

Infographic: Online display advertising effectiveness and use in Australia

Online ad future: rates and campaigns to adapt with real-time brand metrics

Online advertisers utilising automated trading will be able to understand the impact of their ads on brand metrics, such as awareness, favourability and purchase intent, in real time with the introduction of a new online brand effectiveness measurement platform.

With real-time automated online trading for ads set to become a standard industry practice, Nielsen has introduced a research platform that will enable brands to understand which websites and which particular creative executions are driving higher brand engagement than others. The researcher will provide real time analysis that will enable clients to adapt and optimise their spend across the best performing sites and creative during the course of the campaign.

Managing director of Nielsen’s Media Practice Group, Matt Bruce, says much of the focus to date has been on targeting the right audience demographics with performance of factors such as context, placement and publisher only evaluated after the campaign is over. “This means agencies can’t assess how much of a role that contextual placement and or the creative is having in real time; and hence cannot make changes mid campaign to optimise the brand impact of a campaign,” Bruce says.

“Agencies are not alone in facing this blind spot, as publishers risk having their inventories undervalued by media packages bought and evaluated solely on audience delivered, without adequately recognising the additional brand impact generated by campaigns placed within the most relevant content.”

Dubbed ‘Brand Effect’, Nielsen claims the platform is already delivering cost and brand optimisation efficiencies to clients in the US. Australia is the first market in this region that Nielsen will launch the platform in.

Analysis from Nielsen’s work with over 1500 products and 30,000 ads utilising the system shows the biggest drivers of brand metrics are program factors (e.g. context and audience engagement), creative factors (e.g. ad quality and size), media weight, placement factors and competitive activity.

The approach could see publishers adjust rates in line with demonstrated effectiveness of contextual placements on their websites.

 

Whitepaper claims awareness advertising wasteful

A new whitepaper by research agency Pollinate, ‘It’s not me, it’s you: people-centric media planning’ argues that awareness branding is wasted as people only notice situationally relevant advertising.

According the author, the gap between media planning and consumption has led to a century of wasted media. The whitepaper was based on self-funded research conducted by the firm.

“Old media planning models, based on brute force methodologies, such as diaries, fail to capture this crucial detail,” said Pollinate managing director, Howard Parry-Husbands.

“Marketing is evolving. Successful media planning requires a strategic view which puts people at the heart of decision-making.

The full paper can be viewed here.

Recipe of the Month: Cartia campaign

Brand: Cartia
Client: GSK
Creative agency: Grey
Media agencies: Bellamy Hayden and Motivator

Background

Over recent years, a proliferation of anti-platelet products has been driven by the ever increasing incidence of coronary heart disease and causative pathology such as high cholesterol, high blood pressure and obesity. Anti-platelet therapies are a mainstay preventative treatment, both before and after the first cardiovascular incidence. ‘An aspirin a day’ is a widely accepted, economical treatment choice. Cartia is a low dose aspirin product indicated for secondary prevention; i.e. prevention of a repeat cardiovascular event.

Because of its lengthy heritage, over-familiarity and the wide availability of cheap generic products, low dose aspirin is associated with a profound lack of interest; there is nothing ‘sexy’ about aspirin.

Cartia itself is decades old, and had been toppled from its original position as market leader by the cheaper, generic aspirin alternatives. Cartia was considered an old ‘familiar’ brand that healthcare professionals felt there was nothing new about. Grey undertook the challenge to relaunch this well-established product in a flooded market sector where the active component, aspirin, was considered rather old-fashioned.

The relaunch of a branded product within a market dominated by cheap generics was bound to be extremely tough and it would take a unique and valuable selling point in order to be considered. Luckily, Cartia had one in the form of its ‘duentric’ coat. Chronic use of aspirin is associated with gastrointestinal side effects and Cartia’s duentric coat confers a valuable gastrointestinal protective benefit by potentially securing safe transit through the stomach, the area most vulnerable to gastrointestinal side effects.

An advertising and promotional campaign was devised, in bright, eye-catching orange and with the use of cheeky copy, to achieve cut-through and memorability. In order to gain interest, the campaign restated the efficacy of low dose aspirin as a preventer of coronary events and highlighted Cartia’s unique duentric coating.

Due to regulations, Cartia was initially promoted only to healthcare professionals. In mid 2006, however, as the campaign was appearing, there was a regulatory change and Cartia was granted approval by the Therapeutic Goods of Australia Committee (the TGA) for marketing directly to the consumer.

Objectives and strategy

At the initiation of marketing activities, Cartia required GP recommendation in order to gain consumer awareness. Therefore, the primary strategy was concentrated on marketing activities directed to this audience, in order to place Cartia in the ‘front of mind’ position to achieve this recommendation. The primary objective was to secure Cartia as the low dose aspirin most frequently recommended by GPs. The ultimate objective was to regain market leader status and increase sales.

The key message was one of effectiveness and safety:

  • to reinforce the effectiveness of low dose aspirin in preventing cardiovascular events, and
  • to communicate the benefit of Cartia’s unique duentric coating.

The aim was to keep the message simple, but without rehashing the same old approach commonly used in relation to pharmaceutical products, e.g. promoting simply on the basis of the product’s ‘effectiveness’.

Another challenge was having a very minimal amount to spend. A low budget often dictates the use of shock tactics to cut through and be noticed; you can’t rely on a big media spend to hammer a message home. But shock tactics to conservative doctors and pharmacists could undermine the credibility of the message. The question was just how far to push it.

The campaign was therefore designed be acceptably cheeky and witty, remaining relevant to the message and category and not just being clever for the sake of it – simple, strong definitive rational statements delivering the facts. The word ‘bloody’ was used to give the campaign life and personality. The everyday, no nonsense tone was employed to provide a refreshingly honest edge and make low dose aspirin seem as contemporary and relevant today as it was 20 years ago.

The use of orange as a branding colour not only served to create added impact in publications, but became a visual property from print to point of sale to brand reminders, right down to the actual orange duentric coating of the tablets.

Following TGA approval midway through the campaign, communication was expanded to include consumers, with the minimal allocated budget that remained.

Execution

It was important that this product relaunch was impactful yet economical. Creative and media budget was limited to $400,000; therefore creative had to be both effective and simple to execute.

Single-page A4 ads were placed in the key GP trade journals Australian Doctor and Medical Observer. These were selected in preference to double-page spreads (DPS) for increased prominence; it was felt that a DPS advertisement for Cartia might too quickly be passed over once the brand identity and logo was recognised by the reader and potentially considered to be ‘old news’. A single-page A4 ad creates longer exposure as the reader digests the articles on the opposite page.

Throughout all materials, claims were boldly stated with prominent, cheeky, down to earth and simple copy including the word ‘bloody’. This direct and simple approach was designed to reflect the simplicity of once-daily aspirin as a cardio-protective measure, in comparison with the challenges of regular exercise, diet restriction and lifestyle changes.

The advertisement headline read: “You can never be too bloody safe” and rotated with “Bloody effective CVD prevention”.

A DM piece was created to double as a relevant and useful tool for GPs in the form of an A5 Body Mass Index calculator wheel, drawing upon the well-known link between obesity and CV risk. A four-page A5 leave-behind provided clinical information, complete with supporting graphs and evidence to communicate the efficacy of low dose aspirin in reducing CV risk.

It was decided that the best use of the limited budget available for consumer activity was to create an educational/promotional item and a DL brochure was produced. This was distributed via ‘INFOMED’ display stands within GP waiting rooms, thereby lending credibility to the brand, with the headline “Heart Attack? Stroke? Don’t be thick” in keeping with the bold and direct feeling of the original campaign.

The eye-catching orange colour of the brand was put to good use and the creative execution was designed to grab attention and raise interest and excitement in this rather tired area, for the maximum impact.

Results

As a result of the new campaign Cartia has regained its position with GPs and pharmacists as the most recommended low dose aspirin. Cartia has grown to be the number one recommended brand by Australian GPs and pharmacists. Resources have been increased to pharmacists for 2007. All in all a simple, cost-effective campaign that stands out for all the right reasons.

Brand management – who is driving your brand?

Brands communicate to their markets via a multi-supplier infrastructure. Meaning, if you aren’t launching your latest TVC, outdoor or direct mail piece, you are probably managing an internal brand communication project or activating an interactive campaign. Current day marketing responsibilities mean juggling many communication channels and working alongside a diverse plethora of expert communication channel suppliers.

Is that a typo, or did that just read ‘alongside’? Wouldn’t ‘alongside’ indicate that all parties including suppliers are working together towards a common goal? Well, in some instances they are; however, profits returned to a client are rarely shared with the respective supplier.

Agencies for instance may receive awards and the appointment of future business. In the short-term, however, like all businesses, suppliers have their eyes on one thing: their profit and loss statement.

So, do your suppliers really care about (a) the direction and long-term success of your brand? Or are they more interested in (b) selling you something that will benefit them directly? If you answered anything but ‘b’, you are very optimistic, trusting and unfortunately naïve. Suppliers have budgets just like you do. Suppliers need to make certain profits each month to meet running costs.

Does this mean that all suppliers are just in it for the cash? Yes and no. Supplier welfare will always figure ahead of a client’s brand performance. Most suppliers understand, however, that poor channel performance will result in a reallocation of resources away from them, so it is in everyone’s best interest for suppliers to perform well for their client’s brand.

OK, so now that you realise your channel suppliers are only your friends because you pay them, you also need to recognise that these friends often don’t play well with others. Particularly when these ‘others’ have the potential to starve one another’s P&L statements. For example, if your PR firm sells you a wonderful media campaign for the next three months that is outside of the designated budget, then you will naturally move resources away from another channel. Your channel suppliers know this and, consciously or not, are always competing against one another for your resources.

Your problem…

The implications of subliminal faction infighting and competition can be seriously damaging for any brand. The damage is most readily experienced by customers receiving a disjointed brand experience. The better performing brands have the correct weightings on the correct communication channels, and all are based on the optimal market brand interaction and experience. With so many parties naturally vested in their own interests, how can you safeguard the integrity of your brand?

A solution…

Some years ago, Microsoft tackled this issue by introducing a marketing procedure called ‘OneBrief’. OneBrief was the name given to a regular meeting of marketing staff and suppliers to discuss brand decisions. This multi-supplier WIP ensured that all marketing stakeholders were aware of and agreed on brand development pathways. Problem solved, I hear you say… maybe and maybe not.

The concept of OneBrief or ‘OneWIP’ (as named by some other brands that have followed Microsoft’s lead) has yielded some very positive brand consistency outcomes. The concept has also helped marketing and brand managers manage resources. The companies that are set to benefit most, however, are those who have taken this concept one step further and have established what is known as a ‘Brand Council’.

A Brand Council is a group of people, all of whom have responsibility to a particular brand. The most effective Brand Councils are made up of: the client-side marketing team along with representatives from the usual supplier arms: advertising, PR, interactive, environmental (marketing), HR and even L&D for the more intelligent brands.

Furthermore, the most efficient Brand Councils are facilitated by an independent brand custodian. This brand custodian is entrusted to work parallel with the marketing team in navigating a brand’s course. This independent must possess a unique blend of skills and knowledge around the brand in focus, the commercial interests of all parties and the human negotiation process.

Brand custodians are impervious to supplier influence, imposed obligation through wine and dine tactics, and ‘new’ inspiration from a change in staff at an appointed agency.

Holding the reins…

The fortune of a brand’s journey can often be told well before the wagon leaves town, by looking at who is holding the reins and those riding shotgun.

Ask yourself, “Am I truly leading or just steering?”, and have you chosen partners who are genuinely interested in your brand’s optimal passage, or are they more likely to shoot one another to gain greater spoils in the purse?

As cowboy folklore suggests: ‘Trust everybody, but make sure it’s you who cuts the deck and, whatever you do, never ask a barber whether you need a haircut.’