Public broadcasters come out budget winners

The ABC and SBS are among the few winners to come out of last night’s federal budget. The ABC will pick up close to $100m in extra funding with $59.4m to go to news and current affairs and $30m for online content distribution over three years, while SBS has received an additional $30m over five years.

SBS managing director, Michael Ebeid says the budget announcement confirms the government’s recognition that SBS has a continuing and vital role to play in contributing to social cohesion, and to Australia’s success as a migrant nation.

“SBS is a lean and agile hybrid broadcaster which punches above its weight with distinctive and innovative content, despite operating on one fifth of the average budget of all the other broadcasters.”

“This funding will equip SBS to provide the services that are critical to its responsibility to be a broadcaster for all Australians, in a climate where commercial growth is subdued, content costs are increasing and audiences are fragmenting across the myriad channels, platforms and devices available to them,” he says.

ABC managing director Mark Scott has also welcomed the news saying, “This investment acknowledges two of the prime areas where the ABC is using its digital expertise to deliver on its Charter obligations to inform, educate and entertain Australians.”

“The funding will better equip the ABC to provide the mobile and online content that audiences are demanding in ever-increasing numbers. It will also allow our News Division to create new cross-platform content that showcases the best of the ABC’s journalism, including the work of our new specialist reporters, bureaux and regional resources.”

 

Don’t let mobile be an afterthought – 3 tips for getting into mobile marketing

We know that consumers prefer mobile experiences, but if you’re a marketer, there’s a good chance you’ve noticed a campaign on your phone or tablet that has not been designed for mobile. It seems many marketers are still considering mobile as an afterthought, despite the opportunities it presents, and will continue to present as mobile penetration explodes.

There are some great examples of companies using mobile to create fantastic campaigns and consumer experiences: Commonwealth Bank and its Kaching mobile app and net banking platform immediately spring to mind. But for many marketers, mobile is a lower priority than other aspects of the digital marketing mix, such as social media optimisation or display advertising.

Findings from a recent study by the CMO Council into digital marketing trends across Asia Pacific in 2012 support this theory. The report identified the top three challenges for Australian marketers executing digital campaigns as:

  • Budget limitations,
  • resourcing, and
  • and determining the best technology to use.

 

The report also found that only 31% of Australian marketers are allocating digital marketing funds to mobile applications and messaging, and even less (14%) are pursuing mobile advertising.

The benefits that mobile marketing brings to both consumers and marketers are undeniable, and the business opportunity is immense, mobile therefore must be among the top priorities for marketers.

Mobile optimised marketing activity provides consumers with rich, contextual experiences and better connections to the people, brands and information that are important to them. As marketers, we can more effectively create, customise, analyse and optimise content and experiences for consumers that generate better results for our company and/or clients.

The CMO research also found that Australia invests more in digital marketing than any other country across the Asia-Pacific region. While mobile represents a small part of this now, Cisco reports that mobile web traffic grew by 40% in Australia during 2012, and is expected to grow 13-fold globally by 2017. This demonstrates there is real business value in mobile as well as immense marketing potential. So whether you’re a seasoned digital marketing pro, or just getting started, here are three quick tips for getting into mobile marketing:

1. Find out how mobile your community already is

As marketers we crave data because the more you know about your customers, the better decisions you can make when going to market. You can find out how people are consuming your content, including the types of devices they’re using, by looking within the traffic data available through your web analytics solution. Based on this you’ll be able to gain insights about how mobile your community is, which will help demonstrate why a mobile strategy is important to your business – especially as mobile traffic continues to grow exponentially.

2. Build once with responsive web design

With budget limitations being the biggest challenge for marketers, it’s important to build the highest quality/impact mobile content as cost effectively as possible. However, the explosion of mobile devices poses a real challenge for marketers to deliver content across a range of different screen sizes. The answer to this problem is responsive design.

Responsive design enables you to build web content in a way that automatically adjusts to fit any device (including desktop), without compromising the content or the consumer experience. This means you only have to build once, rather than creating lots of separate content for specific devices.

3. Get more out of mobile (and digital) with analytics

When it comes to determining the best technology to use for your digital and mobile campaigns, how you analyse is equally as important as how you build. Mobile is able to give you a wealth of data, such as location, core metrics such as revenue per customer, user path and drop off, which acts as real-time feedback that can be used to optimise the content and consumer experience. So when you’re deciding what technologies you’re going to use in your mobile campaign, always factor in the key metrics that demonstrate success and find an analytics solution that will deliver the data.

As consumer preference for mobile experiences continues to grow, there’s no question that over the next few years mobile is going to continue to be a critical method of communicating with your customers. I’m interested to know though, are you going to take advantage of the opportunity in mobile, or will it stay an afterthought?

 

Mobile will take 50% of budget in 2017, but held back by skills gap: study

Marketers will spend 50% of their budgets on mobile by 2017, but for the moment are hampered by their lack of understanding of the medium and difficulties in quantifying return on investment, according to Experian Marketing Services.

Only 4% of the 320 marketers involved in Experian’s mobile marketing study are regularly implementing mobile marketing activities, despite a widespread belief it will be one of the most important ways to communicate with customers in the future.

Head of research and consulting at Experian, Dave Audley, puts the slow uptake of mobile down to three key reasons: a skills gap in the industry, difficulty in demonstrating ROI and the tug of war for budgets between traditional and new channels.

“There’s some confusion and difficulty when it comes to budget allocation,” Audley says. “Marketers are finding its quite difficult to quantify return on investment by channel. Organisations are reluctant or not committing to investing in the [mobile] channel just yet until they fell confident that they can measure the return that they get.”

Mobile has also added another layer of the complexity to the tug of war for budget between traditional channels and new, Audley adds. “Rather than out with the old in and with the new, organisations are looking at retaining old channels; traditional offline channels are also becoming increasingly important.

“Finding the priority to put the focus that’s needed into making a successful mobile strategy come to life is quite a challenge.”

As a result, almost six in 10 are yet to test the waters with mobile, while 41% have created a strategy but haven’t started implementing it.

When asked to rate the importance of marketing channels, 53% of marketers said face-to-face communication was one of the top three most important channels. Email was rated by 50% of marketers as a top-three channel, and social media mentioned by 42% of marketers as a top three channel.

Early adopters of mobile report good results, the study found. The vast majority of respondents believed the various mobile techniques asked in the study to be effective, with mobile-optimised websites, m-commerce and MMS emerging as the most likely to be perceived as ‘highly effective’.

Email ranked down the list slightly, while custom apps were the most likely to be perceived as ineffective.

Search, display and video pre-roll were not asked as part of the study.

Perceived effectiveness of mobile techniques among marketers

experian

“In the next five years Experian predicts more than 50% of marketing budgets will be associated with mobile, particularly as traditional, above the line channels, such as TV and billboards become more interactive and entwined with mobile,” Audley predicts.

“Clever companies will integrate mobile with existing channels, without compromising other activity. Because mobile is cost effective, easy to implement and is nimble, it creates a dynamic platform where brands can create a two-way dialogue.”

 

Ignorance is not bliss

As a marketing manager (we do most of our stuff online) I have a budget to look after and my main goal is to maximise the return from my marketing investments. I have lots of tactical choices available – banner ads, search, print, emails, newsletter sponsorship, social media and so forth. To decide where to allocate my hard-earned budget, I generally look to the history of my various campaigns and spend more where I know I will get a better return.

The hidden problem for marketers is that many of the measurement tools being used to determine campaign outcomes are totally bogus and so the results being used to determine future marketing investments are false. Truly, you could be operating in a vacuum of blissful ignorance and not even know it!

Most of todays online web analytics tools, including Google Analytics, Omniture, Webtrends and Yahoo Analytics default to what is known as last click attribution – that is, they count the value of the conversion (sale, booking event etc) towards the last marketing activity that happened. Last Click attribution is good for measuring conversion events but will not tell you which campaign brought the customer to you in the first place – for that you would measure the First Click. And what about the other campaigns along the way that influenced the conversion? How do you measure these and make sure they get some credit as well?

The key takeaway is that depending on the attribution model you are using, your return on investment (ROI) and return on ad spend (ROAS) may vary dramatically, and may lead you to make different (and possibly very wrong) decisions about how to best optimise your marketing efforts.

Whilst there are some very advanced attribution techniques being deployed by some companies, the general consensus today is that an approach looking at First, Last and Average Click, side by side, is a sensible and achievable approach – and it can be done with minimal effort (and possibly a spreadsheet, if you must).  Such an approach will show you which campaigns are working better for acquisition, influence and conversion – you can then weight the results to drive the campaign mix you are looking for.   

A recommended action plan:

  1. Find out which attribution model you are currently using,
  2. Re-assess your current marketing program now that you know what your are really measuring,
  3. Implement a First, Last and Average Click attribution model for your business,
  4. Reconsider your mix strategy for acquisition, influence and conversion,
  5. Make more informed and effective investment decisions,
  6. Bask in the glory of knowing you have improved your marketing effectiveness, and
  7. Spend your ‘Management By Objective’ bonus!

This is my personal blog. The views expressed here are my own and do not represent those of my employer, Coremetrics.

2009 officially ad sectors worst year

According to official figures, 2009 was the advertising industry’s worst year.

Revenues for the sector fell 8% last year, to $12.57 billion: $1 billion was cut from budgets. Australia fared better than the US and Britain, which fell by 13% and 12.7% respectively. The previous ‘worst year’ for the sector in Australia was 2001 with a 6% drop.

It only confirms what we already knew, that 2009 was the blackest year for advertising revenue since I first compiled figures in 1960,” said Bernard Holt, CEO of the Commercial Economic Advisory Service of Australia.

The Age reported Steve Allen, a media analyst with Fusion Strategy, explaining the impacts on Australia:

It could have been worse but it could have been better… It didnt seem to matter that things were ticking along nicely here. They just said: Cut and they did.

The information comes after Harold Mitchell, chairman of Mitchell Communications Group – Australia’s largest media buyer, predicted a 5% rise for 2010.

The (marketing) Christmas wish list

Jingle Bells! Jingle Bells! Christmas is in the air! I know I run the risk of causing a few people to roll their eyes and move on because the thought of the approaching silly season can be a little too much for many of us. I’m cool with this, but I’m going to take that chance and hope that for many of you, this is the time of year when we start to pen our thoughts and hopes for marketing campaigns 2010, while reflecting on the year that was and how we could have all done things better.

With this in mind, I would like to get us all thinking about our Christmas wish lists as marketers. It’s not as fun as jotting down your personal wish list and handing it to your partner but still, it’s a nice way to think about the new year and an important task that ensures 2010 will see you and your team make vast improvements to your tactics and realign strategies to fit current business goals. It can also be a highly rewarding and insightful exercise to conduct with your team members. Use it as a chance to brainstorm and collect important feedback on the year’s progress – you’ll be surprised at how useful a little reflection can be.

But back to the wish list… Once you’ve had time to reflect and gather your thoughts about campaigns and strategies gone by, then you can begin your wish list for 2010. I’ve decided to share a couple of common marketing wishes below for us all to consider but I’d ideally like to see feedback to this blog from marketers willing to share their own wish list for 2010. No need for massive detail if you can’t be bothered, but wouldn’t it be good to see how your needs and wants compare with industry colleagues? A lot has happened in the last 12 to 18 months, so go on… jot down your thoughts below and let’s see where people’s priorities lie for the new year.

1. More budget

For most of us, we’ve experienced cut backs in the last 12 months and so the thought of doing more with less for a whole new year is not very appealing. Things might still be tight but if you have facts and data to back up your request for more budget then you stand the best chance of securing more dough in 2010. Think about how you can demonstrate the value of your campaigns in 2009. Work out how many sales or lead generation opportunities your team contributed with each campaign. Show your CEO and/or CFO the actual return on their marketing investment. This is the best way (and often the only way) to secure more cash for your team in the new year.

2. Expand our marketing repertoire

Another common marketing wish is to see growth in the variety of tactics used. It’s easy to get bogged down using the same lead generation ideas and so, for many of us, a new year presents an opportunity to expand our repertoire. But how are we going to do this? If we haven’t secured a whole lot of new budget we’re going to find it difficult to add new campaigns with no budget to support it. And so we’ll probably drop a couple of campaigns that are feeling a bit tired and adopt some new ones. But the critical point here is: how do we make sure that we keep our most fruitful campaigns?

Even though a particular tactic feels tired and boring, it might actually be one of our top performing campaigns. Similarly, when we introduce new ideas, we need to ensure that they are in fact performing better than the campaign they replaced. The new campaign might seem more fun and interesting to carry out but it still needs to bring in results, and it needs to improve on the outcomes generated by the old campaign.

3. Improve the website

This might seem like a low priority to some of you, but for many the process of changing website content can seem like a completely arduous task, no matter how minor the change required. Often senior management get comfortable with a website’s look and feel, and become reluctant to make many changes. Either that or they put change management processes in place that quite simply make it too hard to respond quickly and appropriately to marketing campaigns. In this circumstance, we need to present evidence to support our claim that certain parts of our website create bottlenecks for site visitors. We need to gather data to show how our products page sits too far below the website surface or that our information pages are too long and drive people away.

With these three typical wishes explored briefly, I ask you to contribute your top needs and wants for 2010. Go on, don’t be shy, let’s see what marketers really want this Christmas.

“This is my personal blog.  The views expressed here are my own and do not represent those of my employer, Coremetrics.”

GM to cut 2009 marketing spend

In a 40-page document of financial results released today, General Motors Corporation has disclosed that it will slash marketing in the US by $800 million this year alone, including vehicle incentives.

A report from AdAge.com says that in a December 2008 filing, GM had said it would cut advertising and marketing spending in the US by $600 million by 2012. In document released today, the automaker says the cuts were necessary due to lower sales volumes.

Ray Young, GM’s chief financial officer, says that the automaker had to use a lot of incentives in the fourth quarter to offset the lack of credit from GMAC, but still eliminated leasing in Canada last year and is reducing leasing in the U.S.

“That’s an expensive form of incentive,” explains Young.

GM reported a global net loss of $30.9 billion for 2008, including a net loss of $9.6 billion in the fourth quarter.

All four of GM’s regions around the world moved into the red, but the biggest losses were in the US.

GM’s debt balance grew to $45.3 billion in the fourth quarter, which includes the $13.4 billion the company has already received in federal loans since late last year.

It asked the US government for $16.6 billion more in February, saying it needed another $4.6 billion within weeks and an additional $12 billion more to avoid bankruptcy.

GM has also reported that its net liquidity slid from $27.3 billion in the fourth quarter of 2007 to $14 billion at the end of December 2008.

Traditional broadsheet media now less than 20% of Fairfaxs revenue

www.theaustralian.news.com.au

Marketers investing in the broadsheets are going to have to think on their feet as time gets lean for the papers.

In a recent speech to the Sydney Institute on the future of print media and quality journalism, Fairfax Medias chief executive David Kirk, defended the companys restructure and 550 redundancies, saying that growing competition meant their papers no longer aimed to deliver the news first, but to deliver it the best quality journalism in a profitable environment.

Quality is not just about numbers – how many journalists you have – it is about performance and what our journalists produce, he said.

Quantity does not equal quality.

Today Fairfax, publisher of The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age, was dramatically different from the past as those mastheads now only
contributed less than 20% of total earnings, Kirk commented.

New technologies meant Fairfaxs newspapers were no longer the gatekeepers for news each morning.

We still do set the news agenda for electronic media – there is no doubt about that. And we set the news agenda because we have the resources to do it.

This further solidifies the important implications marketers must consider when revising their advertising and media strategies, and how best to allocate their budgets in response to declining paper circulation numbers.

What percentage of your media budget are you spending online?

With the myriad of media opportunities available to the marketer in an offline and online world, the media channel budget allocation decision will be continually harder to make moving forward. Having worked first hand in media agencies that tackle these conundrums professionally, I can confidently say there is no magic formula to determine the splits. Yes, some major media agencies have developed tools to assist, but Im yet to be convinced that they actually work and are robust.

The rule of thumb I hear bandied around marketing classrooms and boardrooms is 10 percent. I’ve viewed and created many a media schedule significantly higher and lower than this but I doubt they would ever end up @ a flat 10 percent across the board.

Looking at the credit card markets media spend I could confidently say at least 80 percent + is attributed to online media. FMCG, ont he other hand, gets less than two percent. Having worked on campaigns for both categories there are a number of reasons why the difference is so large.

So what about your brands or businesses? Without giving the game away, what percentage of your media budget do you spend online? How do you come to this figure? Do you think it will increase or decrease over time?

Looking forward to your comments.

Guerilla Guide: Briefing ad agencies

I’m sitting in a city café and it ain’t as simple as ‘white with one’ anymore. Skinny cap, soy mocha, skinny soy latte in a mug with the handle facing south. So many variations. People have too much time, too little to do. Here I am ordering a boring old skinny latte, which means cow’s milk… what an environmental sin! Fancy buying the juice of a methane-producing polluter… Do I try to fit in and order a soy drink? Bugger it. I hear soy gives you cancer anyway. Plus I’m already the odd one out: I’m the only person I can see who’s not wearing a tie.

Opposite me is the client, a major player in the finance industry. She’s very bright, very professional, but struggling with her role today. She asks me if I take on briefs. I’m appalled at her forwardness… (Sorry, had to try the joke, but pathetic, I know.) She ignores me, like the entire world population who are under 30, and goes on to explain her dilemma. They are having trouble penetrating the teenage market. Seems teenagers think and respond completely differently to anyone else in their customer base. Amazing. (It is always quite a problem for those in mass marketing. How do you keep a level of brand consistency when the message has to be radically different? But I digress again…) I should mention this is a professional organisation we’re discussing here. While they represent older, conservative, mostly white men, their core target market (for members) is younger, hipper and, like every group today, they are trying to be non-gender specific, non-racially biased.

We go though her understanding of the mindset of the target teenagers. We discuss the findings from a few focus groups they’ve just run. Then she pulls out a folder – it’s neatly blocked together in colours per issue – under headings like ‘pricing’, ‘psychological impacts’, ‘media use’ etc. She squirms, from what I’m guessing is embarrassment. It’s so big I start to feel faint. (Like those folders you get handed on a two-week live-in course.) Maybe I need a glass of water. I catch the eye of a waiter…

I’m hoping, as you do, they don’t really want us to take this all in and come back with something sensible. But, yes, they do. Yes, she expects us to wade through hundreds of pages of tightly typed notes to understand her brief. I think, as I smile and go slowly pale, that it’s got to come from above. This isn’t her. This anal, control freak stuff must be from senior management. I tell her I’ll email back my understanding of her brief, before I send it on to the creatives. That will save her time/money and stop me losing a few from jumping out the window into oncoming traffic.

There’s a point in life where you want to be professional, and there’s a point in life where you have to say, “This is over the top”. Two hundred pages of detail for a job that’s only worth a few hundred grand is a waste of a couple weeks. All it says is one of two things. Either you need another job ‘cause you’re so bored you actually have got time to put together a folder like this, or you need another job because someone in your organisation thinks you need to put together folders like this to brief somebody.

Which brings me neatly to the issue this month. Agency briefing. What works, what doesn’t and what costs you double as much for half as good?

Clients briefing an agency can vary hugely in their approach. From the ‘Just tell us what you think’ as they pass you in the street types, to the very serious this is the brief types who have 23 pages of closely typed thoughts just on the buying process – neither of which is exactly ideal. To get it out of the way, high cost briefings (assuming you’re paying people by the hour) are those that give way too much detail, that send creatives down unnecessary paths that waste time and/or that change frequently.

One of the roles of agency people is often to train clients into what makes a good brief for their agency. This is usually part of the ‘bedding down’ process, followed by all agencies and other creative groups, where you take a client and educate them about your systems and processes under the guise of getting to know them, but that is itself deserving of an entire article.

The public doesn’t care what your brief is

Don’t kid yourself that your cause is the cause of the general public. Their key causes are food, gratuitous entertainment, saving the globe and world peace. Yours only rates a mention if you’ve managed to grab their attention and hold onto it long enough to register on their personal radar. So don’t brief like it’s about you and your cause. Brief when you’ve worked out what it is that will work for the public. What is it the punters want from your widget?

It helps if you make up your mind

“My God, I’ll have to know what I want. And what we need as a company? All we really want is sales in December that are 15 percent better than last year’s, but that makes us sound shallow and this is a national, annual campaign, so maybe I better rethink what it is we want…”. If this is you, don’t panic. We in Adland expect you to be uncertain about it. “Seventy-nine percent of agencies claim clients (yes, you) use the briefing process to establish their own strategy, while 55 percent of clients say that briefs often change after the project begins.” (Paul-Mark Rendon, Marketing Magazine, Canada, September 2006)

Sometimes it’s best to make other people debate it

This paragraph could have been headed ‘leave it to the agency’, but that would have been saying agencies know all, and they just don’t. ‘Getting other people helping’ is a better thought. People who ask tricky questions and debate issues with you at briefing stage are way more valuable than those who just nod and come back in a week with crap. This heavy duty thinking is often the role of the accounts manager (or ‘strategy planner’ in a big, pretentious agency). It’s their job to take a crap brief and distil it down to a message or strategy/concept the creative team can get their heads around and respond to.

The agency needs to understand the job

First and foremost, it’s your job as a client to make sure the agency understands the job. (This is not your only responsibility. Your other key one is approving great creative.) Frankly you shouldn’t be working with them if they don’t understand your briefs. If you’re not sure they understand fully, ask some sneaky questions, like “What is your take-out from what I’ve said?” Or “How do you expect us to be positioned in a year from this brief?” etc.

Don’t be intimidated by suits/creatives

They give you forms to fill out, make a fuss about the content and go over details you didn’t think mattered. It’s all part of the ‘take us seriously, we’re professionals’ bullshit they throw at you to justify their retainers/nice cars.

We can blame anything on the brief in Adland

It’s so much easier than saying, “We didn’t come up with the goods.” Common comments are “the perfect brief is pure fantasy, like putting a rainbow in a jar”. Or, as Neil French (ex WPP creative head) once said, “Client briefs should be skipped altogether – taking things out is always better.”

The brief can be taken way too seriously

My most favourite quote has to be, “Forget just for a minute that you are briefing an agency. Instead, pretend you are standing on the bank of a river, about to build a bridge.” Taken, I kid you not, from the ‘Joint Industry Guidelines for Young Marketing Professionals’ in the UK, which includes marketers, PR people etc.

Mind you, I may be playing down the briefing process. Alan Doyle got it right by saying, “The key to effective briefing is to provide a simple insight that can be dramatised memorably” (‘Joint Industry Guidelines’). Certain information is crucial to any good campaign. So let’s cover what’s absolutely necessary in a brief.

Briefing basics – give this info to the agency

What’s this about?

What’s the actual job? Is it time to refresh the brand’s identity, do you need a new press campaign (because you’re sick of average in-house media jobs) or is your boss on your back to get better results? Whichever way, we all need to know why you’re doing it before you do it.

Who is it you’re targeting?

Demographics: who, how old, income levels, education, where they are, gender, relationships, jobs, etc. If you’re a mass marketer, like Coke, this could be as short as ‘anyone with a mouth’.

Psychographics: how they think, buy, behave, attitudes, perceptions, stage in life, political or entertainment mindset, star sign, hobbies, sports, etc. Again, this could be as short as ‘grumpy dumb people’.

Your company or brand’s position

Where you’ve been, where you are now, where you’re going and how you intend to get there.

What you need to achieve

Key goals and KPIs, time-frames, budgets.

Branding issues

What does the brand stand for (values, features/benefits), how is the brand portrayed (visually/audio/characters), previous recent creative (if they don’t know it) and any brand projections (future plans, if not obvious).

What hasn’t worked in the past?

Previous creative and media buys.

Why this matters

How this brief fits into the overall scheme of things in life, the universe and your career. Politics in your organisation – what does the big boss’s wife like? Is the finance department angry or happy about this sale and why etc.

Media thoughts

Media spend/rationale, if not being developed by the creative agency (always seek their input on this – media groups want to sell more space, costing you money. Better creative uses less, so costs less, saving you money.)

Focus

Core thrust/objectives of the brief – what is the key issue? If you say to a creative team that each one of these briefing points matter, they will be all over the shop. They’ll be doing work on issues to which no one will respond. They’ll waste days chasing moonbeams. Days you’re paying for. On the other hand, if you say this point is critical, this point is number two and the rest are just background you can ignore if you like, then that’s perfect. This doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t discuss things from a range of perspectives. But you must have an idea what it is you want back…

Present how?

Do it a bit face-to-face, and a bit written down. Make the written stuff just the basics and a couple of dreamy thoughts. Keep it under three pages. Background stuff (10 to 20 pages) is OK, but the more info, the more confusing the brief, the more costly it will be.

Avoid too much information

Information overload confuses and freezes creatives. Creatives will always say to you, “We need more information.” Background stuff is great, because it gives them an opportunity to work their head around an issue and this is important because the creative process takes days to filter through from a briefing to great work. And you must allow them to take this time, or you’ll get shit creative. And that process needs bits of information to chew on. But the danger is in giving too much priority to too many issues.

Briefing forms

There are lots of them out there. They are good to fill out when you’re a bit unsure and you want to look busy one morning. I’ve never seen one that fits all circumstances at all times and invariably the short briefing paragraph works better to focus creative efforts than a 20-point form from your head office in Luxembourg.

Bites at the cherry

Many of my best clients will ring in over a couple of days (or send a few short emails) with other thoughts on a tricky brief, as things occur to them. Better to pass on more information or your changing thoughts on focus, than get it a little wrong and leave it wrong. If there’s a bit of information that is critical, give it to the creatives. Don’t assume they’ll ‘get it’ by osmosis.

The reality

Clients are strapped for time and often don’t have anyone inside the operation with whom they can debate these points. And they do need debating. The onus is often on the agency to find the information. If the client can’t provide it, the agency ought to go out and get it. Yes, fill out the best practice briefing list but if you don’t know what one particular answer is that’s not the end. A good agency ought to be able to work with you on finding the answer. All of the above will take time, so cost you money. Get over it.

Rejection is good

Trust the agency who argues the brief. If they put in a decent body of thought, they are worth their retainer.

Limiting your outcomes by your briefing

Many great products don’t go mass market because they think their product is ‘exclusive’. I know factory workers who drive BMWs, millionaires who drive Falcons. What I’m getting around to is that many briefs assume things that are plainly wrong (but seem right to a passing observer), because their authors are in fact ignorant of how the world really works. Don’t limit your career/business by briefing too narrowly.

Hidden agendas

These always exist. Yours are most probably career advancement, making sales, building the brand and, most importantly, being noticed, so it’s easier to explain what you do at the gym when someone asks. Your real need, to give the brother-in-law some work, may never come up at all. Their hidden agendas usually relate to the politics of the boardroom, and/or who’s shagging who in your office or theirs. These agendas rarely cross-pollinate in a positive manner, but one can hope. I’m a big believer in ignoring most agendas, ‘cause if I worried about them, I’d never get any sleep.

Value for money

How to get it is by thinking about what’s needed first, briefing accurately (note it’s called briefing) and then letting go of your baby and allowing people to actually be creative – that’s basically what you’re paying for.

Paying for briefing

If it’s an ongoing relationship, then you’ve already sorted out how the money works and the agency is either formally charging you for taking a brief or you’ve somehow agreed they’ll hide it in other costs (like everyone else in the world does). If it’s a pitch, taking a brief and more so, responding to a brief costs a fortune. If you are a half-decent company you will suggest a payment for the exercise. This normally won’t cover much more than the coffee and croissants run, but it goes a long way to being taken seriously and getting a far better response from management/creatives than those companies who feel (because they don’t get paid to put a pitch to Coles Myer or NAB) that they shouldn’t pay others to pitch. Most agencies nowadays charge by the hour. Like your lawyers. If you asked them to do 50 hours of work, would you expect to pay for it?

Budgets

Give people budgets. Some wankers believe in keeping it to themselves and think that saying something like “tell us what you think we should spend” is clever, like it will magically make your agency ask for less. But all it does is make things too hard for the agency, so you go to the bottom of the pile. Grow up and trust people. The agency is trusting you – they’re investing good money/time in answering your brief.

Sex is quicker with people you know

The better you know each other – agency/client – the less detail you need to give them each time. It can get down to basically a nod and a wink in a dark alley. “Oh, we can finally do the chocolate range. Usual budget. I need something for the board to approve, say next Friday?” That might be it as a brief from a very familiar client.

Working from Home

I had a dreadfully long commute this morning. A pair of thongs dumped directly in my path forced me to divert left, adding a full two steps to my journey from the bedroom to the computer.

Welcome to the world of the ‘home-preneur’, those who have elected to divorce themselves from the traditional workplace environment and establish a home-based business. I’m a very recent addition to this rapidly-growing club and, I must confess, something of a short-timer as I don’t intend to work from the lounge room forever (I find the politics infuriating, for starters!).

With technology enabling high-speed connectivity and peripherals such as printers, scanners and faxes becoming cheaper, there are fewer barriers to entry to starting a home-based business. A phone line and a few power points is all it may take to build your corporate empire (workstation optional).

Home-based businesses make up a very large proportion of the total small business population in Australia. Currently almost three-quarters of all small businesses are home-based, compared to 58.3 percent in 1997, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. That accounts for more than a million people doing it at home. Interestingly, 70 percent of all home-based business operators are male. Approximately 60 percent are aged between 30 and 50 years, 30 percent over 50 and 10 percent under 30.

Setting up at home has obvious appeal. Minimal overheads… no attire dictated… no one watching when you clock on and clock off… none of the distractions associated with a busy office environment… the list is endless. It’s not all pyjamas and beanbags, however – being successful as a home-based entrepreneur requires a high level of self-discipline and focus.

“You need to earn the freedom you’re presented with by having the discipline to put your head down when necessary,” says Samantha Leader, editorial director for www.flyingsolo.com.au, a website dedicated to providing useful resources for the solo business operator. “It’s hard work being responsible for all areas of a business. But as it presents you with the ideal opportunity to model your work in a way that suits you entirely, it makes it all worthwhile.”

Speaking from my own experience, it becomes a very different thought process moving from working for a company to working for yourself. Instead of budgets, benchmarks and KPIs being imposed by management, it’s down to the home-based operator to ensure every day is structured toward achieving those goals. Setting clear goals is fundamental – thinking well into the future and planning for contingencies is essential.

Marketers should be well-versed in all of these basic business rules. One of the factors that concerns many marketing professionals who’d love to start a business at their residence is the stigma associated with working from home; however, the advent of technology enabling home offices to be every bit as ‘wired in’ and productive as their corporate counterparts will soon see that apprehension vanish.

Craig Reardon is director of The E Team, an independent e-business solutions provider specialising in affordable off-the-shelf technologies for websites. He has worked from home on and off for 12 years, and has never found it an inhibitor to his business.

“Having been in business once before and suffering the ignominy of paying landlords rather than myself, I decided to set up at home,” he says. “It keeps my overheads and hence my customer prices down, plus clients are now far more accepting of home-based businesses than they once were. Your location or set-up doesn’t usually alter your skills or effectiveness. In fact, I’ve found that sensible clients value the savings of your working from home rather than see it as potentially being unprofessional.”

It’s an inevitable scenario threatening larger agencies and marketing departments – the home-based consultant able to deliver same quality service at far below market rates. Clients need never know that behind the slick façade afforded by flashy branding and a cool website sits a person in PJs tapping out campaigns and strategies at the kitchen table.

Weighing up

The advantages of working from home are self-evident – it offers a level of flexibility and autonomy rarely attainable in the traditional corporate environment.

“If you work alone you have no employer or employee hassles,” says Leader.
“Office politics are a thing of the past and there’s no getting stuck in the rush hour traffic. More importantly, though, you get to shape your entire working identity so it is meaningful to you. You can put work in its proper place, alongside family and friends. Hence theres no need to delineate between work and play.”

Personal satisfaction, success and a sense of fulfilment in delivering work you’re passionate about form the dream for most marketers. It’s attainable, but Leader warns those considering abandoning the office for the home to consider the following.

“You cant just zone out and get on with it as you can in lots of office jobs,” she says. “You must bring a level of consciousness to your work, which means you experience the highs and the lows more intensely.”

According to Leader, there are a couple of classic traps that beset the home-based business owner, notably:

  • the no one does it as well as me trap, that leads to an avoidance of delegation (soloists can delegate, via virtual assistants for example)
  • the being ‘unable to say no to work’ trap – yes, you can, and you should; learn the concept of the ‘ideal client’, and
  • the ‘insufficient boundaries’ trap – being distracted or diverted from the business, whether by customers, family or other activities that drain energy.

Staying focused and self-disciplined when nobody’s watching are vital characteristics of the successful home-based marketer. “You need to consider yourself ‘at work’ even though you are in a study or other area of the house,” says Reardon. “Working at home adds soul to your work life, but you have to get into workplace-like routines to ensure you stay focused. I heard of one person who actually leaves the house with a briefcase at starting time and takes a walk around the block to emulate the commute to work, repeating it at the end of the working day.”

Unless you are a self-taught computer and peripherals genius, the absence of IT support can certainly be cause for concern as a home-based operator. I light incense each morning and pray, pray, pray my laptop will soldier on through another day. Data back-up is critical – there are many companies offering affordable external storage options. Rely on your hard drive at your peril.

Isolation is also one of the key dangers of working from home, especially in a socially-oriented profession such as marketing.

“Make sure regular breaks are taken,” suggests Reardon. “Get out often for a lunch or coffee from time to time to keep up the human contact, and participate in social rituals like footy tipping to replicate the water cooler conversation.”
Networking and communing with your solo colleagues will definitely help to keep isolation at bay, which is where sites like www.flyingsolo.com.au are highly valuable.

Of course, Reardon resolves his potential isolation issues via his (sometimes) silent business partner. “Get a visitor-friendly pet to keep you company,” he advises. “They are great value, even if they can get a bit rambunctious when clients visit!”

Enjoy your next commute.

Trigger-based marketing as a strategic DM tool

Several years ago, signing up for an American Express Card was an express route to DM deluge. No sooner had you signed on the dotted line than you would be inundated with communication from every corner of the company – from life insurance to flight insurance, baggage insurance, credit card protection… Not surprisingly, the credit card giant found that its reading on the brand health barometer was slipping. People were fed up.

The company has since migrated to trigger-based marketing, where until the customer demonstrates that they have an actual use for a product, it won’t be offered to them. For example, until you use your American Express card to book a flight, you won’t be offered flight insurance.

It’s a shift that is starting to take place all around the globe. Smart organisations are recognising that, as the length of time consumers spend filtering out irrelevant marketing messages gets longer, their tolerance fuse inevitably gets shorter. So while marketers have traditionally focused on getting the right message to the right person, it is becoming increasingly important to get that message out at the right time. But for the marketing message to be appropriately timed, you must understand the customer’s situation, and be able to translate this understanding into the appropriate response.

That’s where trigger-based (or ‘event-based’) marketing comes into the picture. Trigger-based marketing works on the premise that you communicate with your customers at a time when they have indicated a propensity to purchase. Trigger-based marketing analyses customer behaviour to identify changes – or ‘triggers’ – that may indicate the need for a new product or service.

At the most basic level, triggers can include things such as the expiry of a fixed rate term on a mortgage – a key ‘moment of truth’ in the mortgage product life cycle; or a change of address, which may, for example, prompt an insurance company to offer a new home and contents policy.

At the more sophisticated end of the scale, triggers may be based on any number of observations indicating a shift in customer behaviour. For example, a significant decrease in regular salary deposits combined with the payment of a baby bonus would indicate the birth of a child. Or the deposit of an unusually large sum of money into an account may be used as a trigger to contact the customer and offer investment advice. Similarly, in the telecommunications sector, if a mobile customer is consistently exceeding their monthly calling cap, this might trigger an up-sell offer to a plan with a higher cap. In the retail sector, a relevant offer may be made where it is noticed that a high-value customer is shopping less frequently.

Basically any interaction – or significant lack of interaction – that a customer has with a company can be used as a trigger to tailor communications to them in a more relevant way.

Implementing a trigger-based marketing program requires a shift in mindset from traditional database marketing. It’s a matter of changing the focus from a ‘push’ approach to a ‘pull’ approach. “Most marketing is company-driven,” states Alan Rosenspan, president of Alan Rosenspan and Associates, a US-based direct marketing consultancy. “The company decides that they want to hold a sale, start an advertising campaign or create a special promotion. Trigger-based marketing is marketing to a customer when they need you – not when you need them.”

Aligning your communications with the needs of the customer is not just more palatable to them; it’s also beneficial to your bottom line, resulting in higher campaign response rates and a better return on investment. “Improvements in response of 200 to 300 percent could quite realistically be expected,” asserts Grant Stewart, managing director of direct marketing strategy firm Vectis. “Trigger-based marketing not only pulls better response and better conversion rates, it also minimises waste, which means both lower cost to serve and lower cost to acquire.”

State of play Down Under
“In Australia, large organisations, particularly in the financial services industry, have pioneered the development of trigger-based marketing programs,” says Des Viranna, solutions manager – customer intelligence practice for software solutions provider SAS. “Organisations who were early implementers of a trigger-based marketing strategy typically used simple customer-, product life cycle- and transactional-based triggers. These are triggers that are identified through a standard rules-based interrogation of the data. These are important triggers and can provide quick wins in proving the value of a trigger-based marketing strategy. However, organisations are now moving towards the capability to predict customers’ behaviour through the incorporation of strong analytical techniques in a way that ‘hits the target’ more accurately than rules-based techniques can.

“Many Australian organisations are proficient at database marketing. The next horizon for these marketers is to take trigger-based marketing from a largely reactive application to being far more proactive and predictive and leveraging inbound interactions for recommendations based on in-conversation information,” adds Viranna.

According to Regan Yan, MD of analytics firm Digital Alchemy, trigger-based marketing is not a new idea in Australia. “Trigger-based marketing as a concept has been around for many years, but marketers have typically lacked the infrastructure to execute campaigns within the very short time horizons required for trigger-based marketing. We are now seeing an increasing willingness to invest in this infrastructure.”

But not every organisation has the luxury of being able to invest in the systems required to successfully implement a trigger-based marketing strategy. So just who is it suitable for?

“Trigger-based marketing is highly effective within companies that transact with customers on a very frequent basis,” says Robin Russell-Cook GM Australia and New Zealand, Unica. “This typically includes banks, telecommunications and retail. Other industries with less frequent behaviour also benefit, but typically do not have the behavioural information inherent in the high volume transaction data.”

Jim Novo, author of Drilling Down: Turning Customer Data into Profits with a Spreadsheet, adds: “If the business is such that there is a low likelihood for a customer to ever make a repeat purchase, then it’s not going to work in that business, because the timing of additional communications is irrelevant to the customer. Trigger-based marketing is at the core first and foremost about creating messages that are more relevant.”

Putting it into practice
While each company will have a unique set of circumstances and objectives that will define the appropriate approach to implementing a trigger-based marketing program, the process can be broadly split into four stages:

Stage 1. Identify relevant triggers
The first step is to understand which events affect the customer relationship. These events primarily fall into two categories:

  • Customer-specific events – these events affect specific customers and change their requirements or expectations. Examples include the birth of a child, moving to a new house or a change in employment status.
  • Relationship events – these events arise from the relationship the business already has with its customer or prospect. Examples would be the opening of a new account, a transition in account ownership or dropping a product or service.
  • To identify relevant triggers, you need to determine the steps that people take in the process of buying your product, says Alan Rosenspan. “Do they require a demo? Once they do buy it, what are the steps to using it? Are there any obstacles they may face? When will they ‘run out’ of your product, or when will they require an upgrade?

“The other important factor is this: one of the key triggers in a customer’s life cycle is when they actually buy your product for the first time,” adds Rosenspan. “They are in both a ‘buying’ mode and a ‘honeymoon’ mode. And they are therefore very susceptible to TBM at this time.”

Keys to success at Stage 1:

  • involve all key stakeholders within the organisation to build a list of potentially relevant triggers, and
  • prioritise the list according to the most important triggers so that the response plan is manageable.

Stage 2. Monitor triggers
Once the key triggers have been identified, they must be redefined in terms of the available data. In some cases this may require setting up processes to capture additional data. Ultimately, the approach you use to monitor data will depend on the IT infrastructure of your organisation and the types of triggers identified.

“In the simplest world, you can trigger messages using ‘dumb’ processes,” explains Novo. “An example of this would be ‘trigger an email to customer with details of the customer’s order when they complete the transaction’. At higher levels of sophistication, you are tracking customers and looking for behaviour that appears outside the normal behaviour. A customer database containing all transactions with a simple query tool is enough to get started with this approach. The next step up is to use predictive models that help you define the ‘divergence’ in ways that are actually predictive of the customer behaviour.”

Keys to success at Stage 2:

  • understand how to use the available data to detect relevant events, and
  • calibrate triggers so that they are sensitive enough to detect significant events, but not so sensitive that they generate too many false positives.

Stage 3. Respond
This is the stage where the identified triggers are actioned; in other words, where the response is actually communicated to the customer. Depending on the nature of the trigger, the response may be automated, for example through direct mail or email, or it may require a human channel for follow-up investigation.

While much time and effort is invested in identifying and monitoring relevant triggers, the response stage is often where the system falls down. This is largely due to inadequate integration of operational systems. “By far the biggest challenge is organisational, because the source of the behaviour is not always within the marketer’s direct control to address,” says Novo. “For example, let’s say a campaign based on a customer not making a purchase results in a chunk of similar service complaints. The customer is not purchasing due to bad service. How is this addressed? Can marketing sit down with service and resolve these complaints? Often a cross-functional team approach is the best way to manage the response to behaviourally-based campaigns of this type.”

One of the key pitfalls of this stage is not having the right resources and processes in place to respond appropriately to triggers, says Unica’s Russell-Cook. “Traditional DM is focused on making an offer to the customer – these processes can be tightly scripted and delivered through many channels. In contrast, with trigger-based marketing there is typically no offer associated with a trigger – just the fact that the customer exhibited behaviour that may be indicative of a pending product or services decision. Hence, these processes cannot be tightly scripted and require higher skilled resources capable of engaging the customer in conversation, completing a needs analysis and then recommending the right products.

“For example, if the customer deposits $100,000 dollars into their savings account, all we know is that they have deposited the funds – we don’t know what or what products or offers are appropriate,” adds Russell-Cook. “The customer may have received a bonus, a redundancy, retirement payout, inheritance, sold an investment or the family home. The challenge for the bank manager in this case is to engage the customer in conversation to determine what has changed and what products and/or services are appropriate.”

Another critical consideration at the response stage – which can be particularly problematic where human intervention is required – is timeliness. “The very nature of triggers requires that they are detected and actioned within a very short period of time,” says Russell-Cook. “To continue the example above, if a customer deposits $100,000 it can be virtually guaranteed that those funds will be moved from the account within seven days. Also, it is highly likely that the customer will have made the commitment to move those funds within two or three days. Hence, timing is critical if the bank in this case is going to influence that decision.”

Having been involved in the implementation of a successful trigger-based marketing program, Wayne Derwin, direct marketing manager for IMB Banking and Financial Services, advises marketers to be flexible in the way they respond to triggers. “If direct mail is not performing well, a shift to email or outbound telephone can improve the results. Hence companies thinking of moving to this approach need to concentrate on getting the triggers right then implementing them within a highly flexible DM response environment.”

Keys to success at Stage 3:

  • ensure that you have the resources and process in place to respond to triggers in a timely manner
  • implement a system to prioritise responses to the most urgent triggers
  • have systems in place to track whether the response took place
  • make sure you capture information about the customer’s reaction to the triggered response, and
  • maintain some flexibility in the method of exploiting triggers.

Stage 4. Test and refine your strategy
As with any marketing strategy, testing and refinement are essential for best results. The more intelligence you can garner through your trigger-based marketing program, the more effective it will become. “Analytics should be integrated into every part of the process, incorporating strategy and planning, operational execution and measurement of success,” advises SAS’ Des Viranna.

Continual assessment of the strategy is particularly important with trigger-based marketing as it is a constant and ongoing strategy. “If there is a problem, you’re going to see it week after week, and if you’re serious about customer engagement and satisfaction, you will find a way to hunt down these problems and resolve them for the customer,” adds Novo.

Another advantage of continual assessment is that it will help you prove the value of the strategy to key stakeholders within your organisation. “You’ll need some friends around you to support this approach as it involves organisational change as well as supporting technology,” warns Sally Carey, director of Datamine, New Zealand. “One of the biggest challenges of all is taking a longer-term view on return for the organisation and moving from a product focused company to a customer focused one.”

Viranna agrees: “Implementation of a trigger-based marketing strategy requires a cultural shift from product-centric marketing to customer-centric marketing. This has impact on the volume and types of communications that are delivered, the products that are offered, customer contact policies, the channels used and so on. It therefore affects many different parts of the business and will need support from many stakeholders.”

Getting internal buy-in across the company comes back to testing, says Vectis’ Grant Stewart. “Trigger-based marketing needs to be clearly shown as an approach that can deliver greater efficiency to the business. Creating a water-tight business case for it starts with a series of small trials, which clearly show the anticipated uplift in performance. Without a tangible business case being made, the approach remains a theoretical opportunity.”

Keys to success at Stage 4:

  • establish a continuous feedback loop and constantly review the strategy’s effectiveness, and
  • ensure that key stakeholders are aware of successes.

Laying the groundwork
Although the potential returns from trigger-based marketing are high, so too can be the outlay. If, however, you deem it a worthwhile exercise for your company, then it’s worth doing properly from the outset. “Trigger-based marketing is one of those things that you should either do properly or not do it at all,” says Stewart. “One of the main pitfalls is organisations that go into it without a sound infrastructure to support the best of marketing intentions. Putting the right infrastructure in place – a marketing database, a marketing campaign management engine, a marketing fulfilment process – means being able to actually do what you theoretically hope to. Marketers are busy enough as it is and there really isn’t a place for trigger-based marketing as a side project.”