Social media cost of inaction (COI)

The social media party is just warming up as business continues its ongoing transformation. An hour with Google can reveal the potential of embarking on a fruitful social media strategy benefitting businesses and their bottom lines, so why then is first mover advantage still there to be had in most business categories?

Management guru Edward Deming once said, “In God we trust. All others must bring data”. The hero topic in most social discussions is ROI, but I believe the focus should be on COI (cost of inaction). The cost of deliberating, for whatever reason, is always going to be higher than simply opening up collective minds to the undeniable opportunity that is social media.

Brands face an incredibly complex challenge as they have to play with many dials at the same time: traditional ads, digital, web, mobile, apps, social, behavioural. All are tightly intertwined, creating flurries of new metrics: ROI, naturally, but also engagement, sentiment and feelings.

So what possible barriers to entry could there be? What’s stopping businesses from capitalising on the biggest opportunity in decades to leverage a long term competitive advantage over their competitors?

We recently ran a ‘Where are you at with social?’ poll with our data/Twitter base and happily share our top 10 findings:

  1. 15% are hesitant to begin using social,
  2. 60% have tools in place but no long term strategy,
  3. 80% manage their social internally,
  4. 30% use social to stay relevant to their consumers,
  5. 20% use social for brand building,
  6. 20% don’t know much about social or how to start,
  7. 28% say convincing internal management is a barrier,
  8. 40% say having no resource/budget is a barrier,
  9. 40% want to know how to enhance their current offering, and
  10. 35% want case studies and examples.

 

To help overcome social media COI I’ve addressed four stumbling blocks:

  • the most influential people in companies (CEO’s) don’t believe in social,
  • social media ROI is difficult to identify,
  • traditional company cultures/structures are a natural barrier to social implementation, and
  • very few know how to begin the process of getting it right.

Don’t believe

When it comes to social media the first thing to avoid is the HIPPO (highest paid person’s opinion) syndrome.

In many organisations, the highest paid person in your organisation very often has no clue about social media marketing or believes the IT person actually does this! So when this person dictates strategies and tactics, you’re going to run into trouble.

We’ve witnessed time and time again that the most senior people in business ‘don’t know what they don’t know’ when it comes to most things social. Fair enough, sort of, but at least have the moxie to admit it, or invest some time to upgrade your knowledge.

ROI

Degree of trust

In April this year Nielsen published their latest report on ‘Global trust in advertising and brand messages’. A key outcome, charted here, is in response to the question ‘What degree of trust do you place in the following forms of advertising?’

There’s been plenty of comment about this survey and I just want to focus on the top two most trusted sources: recommendations and opinions. I’d imagine that the degree of customers’ engagement and the commensurate cost are top of mind for brands.

Brands can have a credible presence here providing they don’t use the new tools in the old ‘push’ way, and providing they understand how they can add value to their customer base, not just talk about themselves.

The problem for traditional media is that they don’t own these two segments – social networks and consumer websites do. The likes of TV and print (newspapers and mags) which attract an annual investment of approximately $3.5 billion and $3.8 billion respectively, in Australia, are based on a less than ideal engagement metric. For example the all-important TARP metric is based upon the TV being on whilst someone is in the room and a reader is based upon having seen or looked at the front cover.

There’s disconnect here between outcome and cost. My thinking is not about one or the other, rather combining the higher reach/lower engagement traditional media channels with a lower reach/higher engagement social play. Admittedly traditional media still kicks ass but damn it’s expensive, is possibly becoming less effective and the ROI metric is far from ideal. Conversely a well-considered social media strategy can deliver trust and true engagement with metrics such as:

  • identifying who’s (demographics and location) saying what (opinion, sentiment) and where (forums, news feeds, blogs, Twitter, Facebook etc.),
  • identifying key category influencers and brand advocates, and
  • identifying real-time insights for your brand and competitors.

Size of budget has always been a key discriminator, until now. Now it’s about building relationships, something that takes time and cannot be countered with a competitor’s short term investment no matter how sizeable.

Company cultures/structures

Although the marketing department is usually the front door for social media, once it enters a business it should become all pervasive, across all departments (sales, customer service, IT, HR, PR, research, search, promotions, creative etc.) Rather than being 100% of someone’s role, it’s more likely to become 5% of 20 people’s roles.

Subsequently well-established silos within business will become eroded in the quest for an open and collaborative culture both internally and externally with partners and suppliers. Clearly this will take time, particularly in larger businesses.

Such a shift will be regarded as threatening by people who run these silos, generally middle management. The thing is that the shift is inevitable and it’s better to champion the new culture rather than ignore the inevitable. This ring true for anyone?

Inevitable shift

How to begin?

Well it’s not with the tools. If you’re beginning wondering how to use Twitter, Pinterest and Facebook then you’re starting in the wrong place.

It’s highly preferable to begin with your business’s relationship footprint, internally and externally. You have to understand your business needs, social capacity, establish your ROI metrics, audience analysis, staff guidelines, training and support and stakeholder participation.

This is 101 stuff but seems to be basically ignored. Following the six fundamentals of growing a successful social business is easy – you just need to make the jump.

Continue to disregard social media at your peril. Now is a great time to gain ground on your competitive pack through better understanding your customers. Aim higher than cursory ‘likes’ or ‘followers’ and turn COI into ROI.

 

The full-service agency is dead. Long live the full-service agency

Given the rate of change in our industry, now is a good time to be thinking about the future of the service offering (creative, media, digital, search, social, PR etc.) to client partners. This is written from a perspective of having worked at five full-service ad agencies and three media shops over 25 years in London and Melbourne.

If you work in an agency, media shop, digital agency, PR, search or social consultancy, then I imagine you’ll be thinking about some of the issues covered here. If you’re from the client side, then it’s just as relevant because you are the people we strive to partner with. Your business model is equally important as ultimately the future service offering needs to be relevant to your future needs.

Back in the day, the ad agency structure could be summarised as below. Creative solutions were the hero (30 seconds/colour pages etc.) with the account team owning the client relationship. Account planning was emerging and media was a backend function. This status quo meandered on to varying degrees for years until the end of the 20th century.

Brand, Account Management, Creative Centric Thinking Wheel

In 2000, my passion was to re-create a full-service agency with creative-communication thinking at the core, rather than traditional creative. I always felt that starting with the creative concept was putting the cart before the horse. I understood that the words and pictures were the instant gratification bit of advertising that clients liked to focus on, but to my mind, if 90% of marketing budgets were spent on media, why was it only receiving 10% of the client’s interest? Surely starting with the who, what, where and when before developing the creative made more sense?

2000 was a time when several step changes were in play; media independents had established their credentials away from the full-service mother ship and digital agencies began to emerge. As media broke away, so too one of the barriers to entry was removed and we saw creative boutiques make a break for it, closely followed by research shops.

Suddenly clients had some serious service-fragmentation on their hands. The previously cosy reliance on the full-service agency account director became a thing of the past as clients had to juggle their time and invest in better understanding the silos of creative, media, planning, digital, research and production.

Over the years, I think we all benefitted as the quality of clients has improved by virtue of their being better informed, coupled with the need to pull it all together themselves.

A generation has passed and we are starting to see all aspects of media and creative merge – whether it be digital or not. Like globules of mercury, various silos are starting to come together again. At the same time, we are witnessing a game-changer emerge: that is, social media. Anyone who has successfully embraced the potential of social will know the knock-on effect it has way beyond just marketing, and the implications for the agency model.

Agency Dominoes

Social media isn’t a box to be ticked or a department to be manned or even a campaign to be launched. It’s about thinking differently about marketing, customer service and the entire company. It’s about realising that consumers are running the biggest recommendation service in the world and that, as has been tiresomely often repeated, they define the brand (no, this is not new; yes, this is becoming more obvious and important by the day). Today, all thinking about a product, its customers and communications, needs to take this into account – social media cannot sit in a silo.

Social is all pervasive by:

  • Improving customer service, PR and research through a dynamic customer insights (B2C & B2B),
  • reducing investment in traditional media and search marketing as communities grow generating content,
  • converting static web sites to web-based marketing tools with shareable content which in turn drives traffic, and
  • increasing speed of execution, creativity and innovation to enhance marketing effectiveness and in turn generate sales/leads.

Then we have today. Long live the full-service agency. At the very core of a social business strategy is consumer-centric thinking… finally.

Today’s digital and non-digital ecosystem is a good deal more complex than agencies and clients have ever had to face before. If you accept that social needs to be at the core of consideration (and you may not) then the new full-service agency structure, below, is the way forward.

Services Wheel

One of the challenges in the world of fragmentation is that business relationships have become relatively wafer-thin. If you’re a media shop, then you become highly vulnerable to a competitor cutting fees, very much a hot topic at the moment. Likewise if you offer creative services or search marketing, then pricing (often unreasonably) can be a differentiator and catalyst for change.

Much is written about who ‘owns’ social. Many put their hands up but the keys to the long-term-relationship-castle are linked to how deeply we can embed ourselves in the platforms, both internally and externally, of our client partners. Social can power business strategy, not just be seen as part of the marketing mix. If you don’t have direct access to a client’s social properties or work closely with their teams, then you’ll be in trouble. The services we provide today must match what the market demands.

So the question arises as to what skill sets are needed for such a comprehensive full-service agency model. There is no training course anywhere designed to prepare your company for the pace at which this space runs. At FRANk we look for T-shaped people. Such people contribute an area of awesomeness with core skill ability and just as importantly, have an appetite for collaboration, enthusiasm and empathy for the contribution of colleagues.

T shaped

The common denominator beyond the right skills is the need to deeply understand the culture of service, as well as the language of business, to better understand how clients build theirs.

In 30 years much has changed and the rate of change is one of the single biggest challenges facing agencies, specialist shops (media, digital, search etc.) and client partners. We’re at a stage when senior business leaders are happy to admit that ‘they don’t know what they don’t know’.

This social thing is not going away and first-mover advantage is there for most brands to form long term sustainable points of difference over their competitive set.

Who is going to service their needs? Is it going to be a combination of media shop, creative agency, digital agency, research company, PR and search specialists all claiming to be on board to some degree with social, or is it going to be an integrated full-service offering with T-shaped people within?

Be interesting to hear what other service providers think and of course client partners. I’ll be sure to get back to you.

2009: Why do you need to think about social media?

Tamir Berkman takes you through a few reasons why 2009 is going to be a big year for social media:

The medium is coming of age

It’s been a few years since baby social media was born and now it’s a teenager. Still a bit confused but ready to go to work and prove itself.

All it’s asking is a chance and some direction.

 Australia had its share of social media campaigns lately

Two campaigns managed to grab a lot of attention to the medium (yes I’m talking about the Witchery man in jacket and the best job in the world).

The attention was not only on the medium but also on its practices and problems, getting much debate in the media and industry.

Blogs and Twitter are becoming more than a buzz word

Slowly getting traction and acknowledged by traditional media (still not so much in Australia), blogs and tweets are proving to be a major force behind the social media adoption. Some bloggers/tweeters have a following of a small newspaper and a targeted, passionate audience. A few months ago a debate called is Twitter mainstream? popped up all over the net. Even if it’s not – it is now officially debatable.

Clients are starting to ask about it

It’s only a matter of time until all clients will have a social media strategist in-house. At the moment we see a high growth in clients asking to know more about social media, blogs, Web 2.0, Twitter etc. We also see growth in digital strategy take-up.

Budgets are getting tighter

No matter big or small, everyone is worried about their budget at the moment. It’s also clear that you can’t sit still. In times like these, knowing more about the latest technologies and practices seem like a good idea.

The smell of change is in the air

When things are changing dramatically, people and businesses have their survival mechanism kicking in. We are built to adapt, adopt and evolve.

But… with this upcoming evolution, a few questions come to mind: what is social media? What is a social media campaign? Is it a social media campaign if you use YouTube as your player? What about seeding the campaign through YouTube or if you have a user-generated section? I’m finding these questions more and more irrelevant. The important thing is to realise it’s time to talk with your audience and be honest. Use the social/online tools and be approachable. Learn how to listen and find out what will make your clients happy.

Please let me know your thoughts in the comments. After all, it is social media, no?

More about this topic on the FRANk blog:

http://frankmedia.com.au/blog/

Brands … love you, love you not

Kylie Flavells editorial in the current issue of Marketing touches on the subject of consumer guilt when favouring certain brands. Yes there are certain brands we all love to hate but it appears their lack of popular appeal is irrelevant and in some cases a plus in reflecting financial success.

Check out the Brandwars site by clicking on the logo below:

brandwarslogo.bmp

Enter Brandwars

Brands are throwing themselves at our feet
vying for attention and money investing $Billions each month. The thing
is though, brands are only as good or bad as we perceive them,
despite their best efforts to shape our views. Brandwars
is designed to elicit our innate opinions towards brands in the form of
a tag cloud – a format in which the size of the word corresponds to its
frequency among responses. Frequently submitted words are shown in
giant type, while rarely-submitted ones look tiny on the screen. Brands
rotate on a random basis to minimise competitor-abuse.

Brandwars takes the concept of brands beyond the norm and includes personalities (politicians, media personalities, sportspeople
etc), media (TV networks, newspapers, radio stations etc) and sports clubs
(AFL, NRL, A-league etc).

Brandlove allows us to track overall brand sentiments along the scale from love, good, neutral or bad to hate.

In a climate where the impact of every dollar tries to be
accountable the tried and tested brand awareness (aided and unaided) and brand preference continue to be viable benchmarks. Brandwars adds
another dimension. After all, just because were aware of a brand it
doesnt mean we necessarily like it.

If you become aware of this then how does this change your perception of Coca Cola? Has your attitude towards the Olympics become just a little more cynical?

The current list of quintessentially Australian brands can be found here.

Brandwars was inspired by a similar initiative in the US called brandtags created by Noah Brier for which we are thankful.

Exclusive video interview: Joseph Jaffe, Part I – the winners and losers of social media marketing

This post is the first in a series of six that feature an exclusive video interview with international speaker and author Joseph Jaffe. Click below to read the others:

  1. Exclusive video interview: Joseph Jaffe, Part I – the winners and losers of social media marketing
  2. Part II – will online video blogging fizzle out?
  3. Part III – why is Australia lagging behind in social media?
  4. Part IV – Second Life as a marketing outreach tool
  5. Part V – did Joseph Jaffe blackmail a major airline?
  6. Part VI – some riffs on brand arrogance, digital storytelling and the future of marketing and advertising.

You asked the questions, and he answered them.

In the run-up to the arrival of Joseph Jaffe in Australia, Marketingmag.com.au will post one
short video clip every other working day for ten days. Each clip is
part of a long interview we conducted with Joseph using the online
video conferencing software ooVoo, a client of Crayon (Josephs company) and a platform well be playing with over the next few months.

Over the course of the five posted clips youll hear social
media thinkers and marketers from Australia and the US ask Joseph their
questions, which include:

Today | What examples do you give of brands that have successfully started a
conversation online, and which brands have gotten this spectacularly
wrong?
          Tamir Berkman, FRANk Media

Fri 8 August | Is Kate Modern the beginning of a trend?
          Gavin Heaton, www.servantofchaos.com

Mon 11 August | Why is Australia currently ranked only number 15 in the world in terms of uses of social media in marketing?
          Simon Small, Fnuky

Wed 13 August | Does having a presence in Second Life remain
important for Crayon [Josephs company], and for what type of business
is Second Life effective outreach?
          Connie Reece, www.everydotconnects.com

Fri 15 August | How would you feel if someone said that your recent posts and events surrounding Delta Skelter could be considered blackmail?
          Zac Martin, www.pigsdontfly.com

Theres other conversations from the interview, so Ill put these in a bumper final sixth post on Monday 18 August.

Please get stuck into the comments because Ill be meeting up with
Joseph during his short stay in Australia and Id love to be able to
fire some of your questions and thoughts at him over a few beers.

In todays clip, Tamir Berkman of FRANk Media asks Joseph Jaffe:

What examples do you give of brands that have
successfully started a conversation online, and which brands have
gotten this spectacularly wrong?

The audio is a little out of sync with the visuals, so unless you
love badly dubbed movies or are simply transfixed by either Joseph or
myself, Id suggest plugging the earphones in and listening to the man
that wrote the book – literally – on the future advertising landscape.

Joseph Jaffe is used to being asked what the future of advertising looks like. His 2005 book Life After the 30-Second Spot: Energize Your Brand With a Bold Mix of Alternatives to Traditional Advertising laid out a blueprint of the alternative advertsing methods to the mighty TVC, a mix of methods which many in the industry are now flocking to better understand and use in their own marketing plans: word of mouth, conversational marketing, social media marketing – these
are the tools Joseph Jaffe prescribes for reaching out to consumers and
customers, and for delivering value over and above the TVC.

His follow up book in 2007, Join the Conversation, further emphasised the need for marketers to adapt to the brave new world of the internet, social media and networking, consumer-generated content,
blogs, and podcasts by joining the rich, deep, and meaningful customer
conversations already in progress.

Joseph arrives in Australia with the help of TCO for a whirlwind speaking tour that lasts from 19-21 August. If youre keen to get a chance to hear Joseph, you might like to consider booking him by contacting krystal@theconscience.org, but please note, he doesnt do weddings or pantomimes [Ed: joke.]


If you enjoyed this series of exclusive video interviews with Joseph Jaffe, consider registering with marketingmag.com.au. As well as letting you comment on exclusive video interviews, blogs from a cross-section of industry experts and the latest daily marketing news, youll also be able to search our extensive range of marketing jobs and get headhunted by top employers and agencies from across Australia.

As a registered member of marketingmag.com.au, youll also be able to enter our monthly competitions and youll be able to take advantage of our special members-only rates to conferences and seminars throughout the year.

Register and become part of Australias online marketing community now!

Be real or fake off

Anyone with a blog or that is posting to a blog will already understand that blogs need a regular, staple diet of home-grown organic produce.

Feeding an offspring in this way can be time-expensive and there is the danger of cutting corners with mass produced thoughts.

Even some of the big guns in blog-land Seth, Ted, Springwise, Adrants, Techcrunch, logic + emotion or other Power 150s presumably feel the pressure not to run themselves into the ground in the quest to add value on a daily basis.

FRANk’s blog, now seven months new, emerged from the desire to reflect the character of the company via our collective musings and to generate maximum Google-juice. It would be un-FRANk to believe all our posts are equally satisfying but after a while the ability to capture a spontaneous thought with a post in mind becomes more second nature.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and FRANk is continually surprised about what generates the most noise by way of responses. Not every post needs to be highly contentious or mind-breaking. Just being real, of the moment and positive is the key.

With all this in mind we look forward to regularly feeding this new blog with true organic produce.