B2B Big Plays: Atoms, daydreaming marketers and Google Plus?

B2B Big Plays features news and events from the planet, and is proudly delivered twice a month by B2B Marketer, Australia’s largest B2B marketing group. 

 

Nomination for the Academy Awards? IBM’s ‘A boy and his atom’

Global – Cue husky voice-over guy: IBM scientists have moved atoms by using their scanning tunnelling microscope to make a movie, ‘A boy and his atom’. It is the World’s Smallest Stop-motion Film, and goes to show that nanophysicists know how to have a good time…

The plot is a bit thin, basically like Snakes on a Plane, the title says it all. But for a piece of content, it has showcased that there are some really smart people lurking in the halls at IBM (when was the last time you manipulated one of smallest particles of any element in the universe?)

What the film lacks in story, it makes up for in geek cool. This breakthrough could transform computing by providing the world with devices that have access to unprecedented levels of data storage.

What a brilliant way of generating quality content. I hope they do a remake of Old Yeller, this time without the rabies.

 

Marketers daydream… yeah, so what?

UK – For some reason (there’s a prize if you know why) Travelodge put out a report that says nine in ten marketers say regular daydreaming helps to improve performance and motivation in the workplace.

Now it gets embarrassing because I have no idea why I’m putting this out there (or why I read the stupid report), but they also claim that marketers daydream seven times during their working day with each daydream lasting on average more than five minutes.

If your boss clips you on the back of the head to wake you up, fire back with the conclusive proof that 90% of marketing professionals employ daydreaming every day to ‘help them improve their performance and make them more motivated in the workplace’. So is that what George Costanza was doing under the desk in that Seinfeld episode?

 

Got an opinion about HTML5 ad guidelines?

New York – If you want to have a crack at shaping the guidelines for HTML5 (I can’t wait!), then the Interactive Advertising Bureau has released the HTML5 for Digital Advertising 1.0 standard for public comment.

The guidelines are designed (apart from getting free publicity) as a resource for digital advertising designers and creative executives who are developing online ads using HTML5.

If you have ever wrestled with such issues as file and ad unit size, in-banner video advertising and animation, efficient ad creative packaging and ad server compatibility, then here’s your chance to speak up. The guidelines are available in all their glory at here 

A ray of sunshine? Tech marketing budgets up 3.7%

US – IDC’s 2013 ‘Tech Marketing Barometer’ was released earlier this month and the big number we all like is that budgets are on the way up for tech companies. Based on an online survey of 64 senior marketing executives at large technology companies (with average revenue $4.6 billion).

Pause for stating the bleeding obvious: “For B2B companies, lead management is the major process for marketing,” says Kathleen Schaub, VP/CMO advisory service at IDC.

OK, perhaps Kathleen could have given some of the more juicy insights such as: cloud computing software companies show the strongest growth this year (up more than 15%), and overall revenue will grow by an estimated 4.8% at tech companies this year.

Is that a pulse we can feel over there?

What are the positives for Google Plus?

Global – Hands up who uses Google Plus? Hum, thought so. Apparently there are 343 million users, with 27% of them considered active. But what’s the utilisation for being involved?

I have been beset by people gushing over the ability to set up private hangouts for meetings, bring up docs and edit them, show a video and collaborate, then record the whole thing and incorporate it into CRM. And it’s immediately available on YouTube.

Would love to get feedback on Google Plus from B2B marketers.
Is it useful?
Is it any good?
Or just don’t bother?

Let us know in the comments, on Twitter, or in the LinkedIn group…

 


B2B Marketer logo1
B2B Big Plays is proudly delivered twice a month by B2B Marketer, Australia’s largest B2B marketing group.

 

The balance between intuition and data-driven decision making

“Marketing strategy is a combination of analysis and art – know more and then be creative.”

That quote from Brook Carter, head of marketing strategy and insights at AustralianSuper, is timely given the recent interest and/or hype in the use of business analytics as a means of understanding useful patterns within ‘big data’. This article is based on conversations I’ve had and comments heard, in particular at a breakfast event I hosted last month at the Deakin University/IBM Centre of Excellence in Business Analytics, titled ‘Finding the balance between intuition and data-driven decision making.’

The interest/hype around ‘big data’ and its implications for customer and business analytics has been driven by two things:

  1. The proliferation of digital footprints (shared images, likes, comments, tweets etc) consumers are leaving in cyberspace from an array of devices (phones, tablets etc. They are doing this prior to purchase when in search mode as well as after they purchase a product. The amount of this unstructured ‘evidence of attitudes and behaviours’ is growing exponentially, and
  2. the ability of large computers to process information at unprecedented speeds.

 

Implications for strategy 

For marketers, this provides the potential to use ‘big data’ to enhance competitive advantage in a number of ways. These include: identifying unmet needs, alternate, richer segmentation criteria, more precise targeting of offers in terms of time and channel, being forewarned of PR issues about to escalate and, finally, identifying issues that might lead to customer churn.

According to Brook: “With the amount and speed of information we have at our disposal, as well as the leanness and commercial reality of business today the old frameworks of the ‘360 degree or end-to-end marketer’ is gone. We are in an era of specialists.  If your current marketing team is focussed on ‘business as usual’ or ‘thinking for incremental growth’ activities, then hire in someone to think big. Innovation is the catch cry, so be innovative in your products, services and most importantly, the type and calibre of people you bring into the organisation.”

Gautam Bose, general manager of customer analytics and research in marketing at NAB says a ‘big data strategy’ should consider the following questions:

  • How do we personalise the information for our customers to influence them?
  • What tools do we have at our disposal to do this and when?
  • What are the different tactics we should employ?

The ‘IBM 2010 CEO Study: Telecommunications Industry Perspective’ co-authored by Skev Ioannou, market segment manager for the telecommunications sector at IBM, says a CEO’s most important priorities were:

  • 93% – ‘getting to know their customers better,’ and
  • 69% – ‘insight and intelligence’.

In a recent IBM case study it was found “good, big data is essential, but unless there is corporate alignment and clarity, then strategies will not be executed through the business and there will be no improvement.”

Implications for skills and recruitment

Bose says, “Marketing departments need to be skilled in the following areas: ability to produce and publish content, ability to share knowledge, managing the communication overflow, balancing openness with confidentiality, and finally, staying ahead of the ‘curve’.

Both Bose and Carter highlight the ‘collision’ between market research (data at rest) and dynamic market information (data in motion). What is the new role of the traditional market researcher given the type and speed of information we are now receiving through 24/7 technology?

In terms of the need for skills in this area, some universities have responded to this shortage and introduced academic offerings in business analytics. Dineli Mather, head of the School of Information Systems at Deakin University says, “The Deakin course aims to develop business analytics professionals with a broad skill set spanning business analysis, information management, data analytics, business intelligence and decision analytics, rather than ‘data scientists’ who focus entirely on the analytics.”

This growing area also has implications for recruitment Christine Khor of Carrera Partners, who says, “From a talent acquisition and hiring perspective, this adds another layer of complexity. The amount and speed of the information we now have access to is astounding. High performing employees of the future will be those who have the ability to access and assess data but also know how to process that data.  Is it useful? Is it junk? Can it be shared and what are the implications of sharing?

“Years ago companies would have one media spokesperson who was well trained and scripted. In our modern world of data and digital we are all potentially spokespeople for our organisations. The onus of getting the right people into organisation who have the ability to think through implications quickly is even more essential.

“Additionally, the role of the specialist within organisations will increase. With the greater depth of data we have access to the greater the need for specialists understand and draw insights from that data.”

Historically, market researchers and marketers have looked at the correlation between an action and an outcome. For example, when we run an advertisement for diet pills after Christmas, sales increase. The bigger question is why? What are the psychological, cultural and environmental triggers to this purchase and how do we replicate this to ensure sales throughout the whole year? Again, this needs strategic thinkers with initiative and an inquisitive nature to understand and interrogate the data.

From the discussions I’ve had and readings, these are some of the key barriers to an organisation’s ability to effectively use data on a large scale:

  • Political interdepartmental pressures and conflict between marketing and IT (who owns the process?) and marketing research (do we need surveys anymore?),
  • the difficulty of getting business analysts with the right ‘skill/mind set’. Ideally a blend of commercial acumen combined with rigour and patience to go through seemingly endless correlations within diverse data sets in the hope of finding a causal relationship that marketers can use in developing products or evaluating marketing performance,
  • developing a culture that accepts databased logic in decision making, and
  • identifying spurious versus real relationships in data.

 

In summary, we are at the early stages of ‘The Big Data Journey’, and two things appear clear:

  1. Trial and experimentation appears to be the approach, and
  2. some organisations have a board or CEO putting pressure on the marketer to show they have a plan to consider or implement ‘big data’ initiatives, while in other organisations marketers are proactively selling the ‘big data’ business case to the board.

A final thought from Bose: “Big data is about causation not just correlation. It is about answering the question why?”

 

Did you know: in each issue of the print edition, Marketing includes the very best opinion articles curated from our huge industry blogging community, as well as exclusive columnists writing on the topics that matter? Becoming a subscriber is only AU$45 for a whole year, delivered straight to your door. Find out more »

IBM’s CEO on data, the death of segmentation and the 18-month deadline

Big data will spell the death of customer segmentation and force the marketer to understand each customer as an individual within 18 months or risk being left in the dust, according to IBM’s CEO Ginni Rometty.

Speaking yesterday at the ‘CMO+CIO Leadership Symposium’ in Sydney, Rometty outlined three paradigm shifts marketers are poised to go through, giving the industry 18 months to sink or swim.

The most telling for marketers was the shift from segmenting customers into groups to understanding and targeting each customer as an individual.

“Marketers will say my job has always been to understand customers segments,” Rometty explained. “The shift is to go from the segment to the individual. It spells the death of the average customer. Take the data and do things like real-time pricing, you’re going to do omnichannel… you’re going to bring out the latency in the data.”

The second shift covered was the evolution from reaching out to customers to creating a “system of engagement” that keeps track of interactions between brand and customer, and uses insights to maximise value creation at every touch point.

Thirdly, cultural alignment and authenticity was identified as another important shift, as data is used to personalise and contextualise interactions. Rometty, who served as IBM’s chief of marketing and communications before moving into her current roles as CEO, president and chairman of the company, stressed the importance of designing brand and culture so they are authentically one.

Transparency is important in achieving this, she says. “One of the ways I believe you can help drive a transparent culture is to make it a social enterprise.”

Yesterday’s Leadership Symposium brought together CMOs and CIOs to tackle business transformation issues as big data creates the two business divisions to work hand in hand. Analysts forecast the CMO will spend more than the CIO on technology by 2017 and predict the pair will end the year as either friend or ‘frenemy’.

Rometty believes big data will form the basis of competitive advantage, noting that once a business starts gearing around data, “it is inevitable the next thing you have to do is to link into all the information you’re already collecting”.

Her explanation to the audience of the impact data will have:

“Big data, social, mobile will form the basis of competitive advantage. Let me give you a couple of data points about big data and this next era of technology. When you think of it this way it is here to stay. All of these phenomenon are happening at exactly the same time and never in history has that happened before.

There are three Vs associated with big data. The first one is the volume of it that’s out there. Today there are two xenobytes of data [created every day]… By 2015, it will be 40 times that amount. Where on a ‘u’ curve that is [about to rapidly arch up].

The second V is velocity. The speed at which you’re seeing this data come past your company. Every two days the world creates as much data as it did through all of time until 2003. We’re used to data that fits nicely into rows and columns… but 80% of what is collected today is unstructured.

The last and the most important is the word veracity. If you look it up it means ambiguous and uncertain. All of this data, conversations, photos… what do they mean? What is the context? By 2015, 80% of all data will be uncertain. CIOs can’t write enough programs to get through this data. Just in time a new generation of computers are coming out. They’re not programs, they discover.

The difference between a market leader is always on the edges of what they do. The aggregation of business data will differentiate what you do… This is a new era of technology and because of it big data is going to form the basis of competitive advantage.”

 

Djokovic and Azarenka top Aus Open social media charts

Success breeds success online, as Australian Open champions Novak Djokovic and Victoria Azarenka discovered by topping the tournament’s social media charts after defending their single’s title crowns.

The world number ones topped IBM’s Social Sentiment Index, which analysed 9.4 million online mentions, after winning 2013’s event over the weekend, both scoring more than 97% positive sentiment across Twitter, Facebook, forums, news sites, blogs and videos.

In the men’s competition, runner up Andy Murray took second place for popularity. In the women’s, Serena Williams ranked second, despite her quarter-final exit at the hands of up-and-coming compatriot Sloane Stevens.

Bernard Tomic was the most popular Australian player of the tournament, despite years of negative press around his attitude and run-ins with the law.

Across the two-week event, there were more than 9.4 million mentions of Australian Open 2013 players on Twitter, news sites, blogs, videos, Facebook and forums. 2013 marked the first year in the tournament’s history that IBM lent its social media software and natural language processing to determine the most positively referenced players on social media.

Also read: How the Australian Open used data to connect with armchair sportsmen.

The US was the most active country across social media sources during the tournament, followed by the UK, Australia, Germany and Canada.

The number of tweets referring to the tournament and its players peaked at the beginning and end of the event. The final day of the tournament achieved a record 1,020,343 tweets, spurred on by the men’s final between Djokovic and Murray.

Overall, male players consistently dominated the Australian Open Social Leaderboard, receiving a higher number of tweets than female players every day of the tournament.

Graham Kittle, business analytics and optimisation, IBM Global Business Services, Australian and New Zealand, says IBM was able to treat the tournament as a “living lab environment” for its business analytics software.

“The explosion of social media means marketers have unprecedented access to unstructured data about their brands,” Kittle adds, stressing the importance of using analytics tools to understand how people feel about their brands and identify shifts in attitudes.

Aus Open Social Sentiment Infographic 2013

Analysis of IBM’s Black Friday report

As the US emerged from the Thanksgiving holiday, the data and analysis of the seasons online sales came in thick and fast.

While we in Australia more commonly associate the term Black Friday with bushfires, in the US it is the Friday following Thanksgiving Day. It represents the biggest trading day of the year for many retailers. IBM has released it’s initial analytics findings which lets us examine online consumer trends, and identify some potential implications for Australia in the coming year.

Overall the Black Friday online sales rose by 20.7% over the 2011 figures. Unsurprisingly, mobile site visits and sales increased significantly. The continued rise in smart phone adoption saw mobile transactions exceed 16% which is close to double that of the year before. At 10% of online sales, Apple’s iPad generated the majority of this activity, accounting for more traffic than any other smart phone or tablet device.

Following the trend of ‘showrooming’, or using a mobile device to compare prices, consumers utilised websites, mobile devices and apps simultaneously to get the best bargains, sometimes while in the actual stores. This behaviour led to a drop in the average  order value by 4.7%, even though spending rose overall.

Interestingly referrals that converted into sales driven by social networks decreased by 35%, and only generated 0.35% of sales overall. That is only part of the story though, as the social media sentiment expressed by shoppers on “promotions, shipping and convenience as well as the retailers themselves…” was extremely positive. This suggests that social media referrals played a much bigger part in the overall awareness of online sales than the raw numbers suggest. This isn’t surprising as people do not always behave in predictable ways, and good metrics can be difficult to pin down.

The industries that were the stand out performers were departments stores with 16.8% growth in sales over the previous year, health and beauty with 11%, apparel sales with 17.5%, and home goods which had a huge online lift of 28.2%.

Although the IBM report is useful in showing how shopping behaviour is changing at the digital check out, it is missing insights into why this may be the case. This is common with these types of reports as they find it difficult to look at the entirety of a shopper’s journey.

What we can tell is that the online shopper is changing their behaviour.

The further down the purchase pathway they are, the more the consumer relies on search.

The multi-channel approach that emerged last year suggests that an increasing number of consumers are now getting online earlier. The online environment is increasingly becoming a space to browse and learn about products.

This is the key insight that retailers need to be aware of. Consumers are clearly becoming more comfortable with online shopping across many categories, and are not just browsing to find the best price. People are seeking out recommendations and trends.  Social media behaviour is having a larger impact on shopping trends than ever. These trends are only going to become more prevalent.  These will lead to an e-commerce tipping point, it’s only a question of when.

 

How the Australian Open uses data to connect with armchair sportsmen

Data has become one of the key fan engagement tools for this year’s Australian Open, with match statistics, player histories and social media insights used to connect with the armchair sportsman.

Tennis Australia’s 20-year partnership with IBM has seen additional layers of data-driven content added to the event’s website each year, to the point where fans can now analyse players’ game plans, track turning points and monitor player popularity as matches unfold.

Samir Mahir, CIO of Tennis Australia, says data is being used to give fans a connected experience with the tournament. “The ultimate aim of our technology solutions for the Australian Open is to deepen our fans’ engagement and enjoyment of the event. Analytics continues to change how Grand Slam tennis is viewed and played.”

IBM’s ‘SlamTracker’ tool enables fans to analyse match ups between players, track key performance indicators and turning points in the match on the second screen while they watch at home.

The KPIs were developed for individual players in the draw using over 41 million data points that look back at the players’ performances at grand slams over the past eight years. The analysis reveals ‘keys to the match’ that have helped players win in the past and tracks how they are delivering on those keys while their game unfolds.

Slamtrack

Social media sentiment is also monitored and displayed in a ‘Social Leaderboard’ on the Australian Open website which players are the most popular and viewed the most favourably. Tweets and ‘likes’ of stories about player on the site drive the social rankings.

“Consistent with the worldwide trend, we are seeing a huge increase in the volume of fan conversation via social media,” Mahir adds. “Social media insight has an increasingly important role in how Tennis Australia and other organisations make decisions and engage consumers.”

Fan Centre

IBM’s software will also help predict when demand on the tournament’s website will spike to help with provisioning capacity.

 

Interbrand: Coca-Cola pips Apple as top brand, Aus brands need to internalise values

Coca-Cola has topped the list of Interbrand’s Best Global Brands for the thirteenth year running, but its reign looks set to come to an end next year if Apple continues to grow.

Valued at US$76.6 billion, $1.2 billion behind Coca-Cola, Apple’s worth grew by 129% over the past year, according to the brand consultancy, which takes a more conservative view of brand as a long term asset than rival top brand measure Millward Brown’s BrandZ.

Interbrand’s list of top brands, which includes IBM at number three, Google at number four and Microsoft at number five, was dominated by the technology category, which was by far the strongest as a consequence of the shift from an industrialised to an information-technology age, says CEO of Interbrand Australia, Damian Borchok.

“The sheer growth in tech companies defined the study, particularly with Apple where it had 129% growth in brand value this year to jump into the number two place. That growth is likely to put it into the number one place next year.”

Coca-Cola, by comparison, showed steadier growth at 8%, while other top movers Amazon, Samsung, Nissan and IT company Oracle clocked double-digit gains to move up the ranking.

Google strengthened, up 26% to $69.7 billion, to take third spot off Microsoft, which dropped to fifth with a decline of 2% to $57.9 billion. Samsung moved into the top 10 for the first time with a value of $33.0 billion, and was joined by the most valuable automotive brand Toyota on $30.3 billion. The pair were two of the ten brands from Asia Pacific to make the top 100, compared with 56 from the Americas and 34 from Europe and Africa.

Borchok says one of the key ingredients in the top brands’ success was an internal culture that uses the brand as a “lens for judgement across the whole business”. “The innovation that they apply, not just product innovation, but in the way they innovate their business models, services, the way that they use not simply traditional marketing and communications as a way of brand building but how they operationalise that… They’re aligning and operationalising the brand through the whole business so it’s not just departmentalised in marketing.”

Brands that align their internal processes to their brand have a strong sense of purpose and focus, Borchok says, noting that Australian brands could be better in this respect. “I still see way too much focus on marketing communications rather than using brand as a way to align people products and service, channel management, etc. There is still way too much reliance on using communications to build a promise but not necessarily stitch a whole business together.”

Looking at other sectors, FMCG brands were generally stable, with Coca-Cola, Kellogg’s, Heinz, Colgate and Nestle notching single figure growth, and Kleenex the only one in the top 100 to experience decline. Borchok expects steady rather than strong growth to continue through expansion, given most FMCG categories are quite mature.

After struggling over the past couple of years, automakers bounced back strongly off the back of global growth and developing markets, and the use of digital technology to enhance customer experience.

Luxury remained strong, however, troubled times could be ahead for premium apparel brands with Burberry – usually the bellwether for the industry’s future, according to Borchok – issuing a profit warning in September. Prada grew strongly, however, breaking into the top 100 for the first time with a brand value of $4.2 billion.

Facebook, now that its financials are available following this year’s public float, also entered the top 100 in position 69 with a value of $5.4 billion.

Millward Brown valued Apple at US$182.9 billion in May – only a 19% increase on the previous year’s reading – and ranked Coca-Cola in sixth place with a value of $74.3 billion.

Interbrand’s study examines three key aspects that contribute to a brand’s value: financial performance of the branded products or service, the role the brand plays in influencing consumer choice and the strength the brand has to command a premium price, or secure earnings for the company.

 

We are all in this media game now

That’s the guts of a 20 terabyte report recently released by IBM: ‘A snapshot of Australia’s Digital Future to 2050’. Written by strategist Phil Ruthven, it is crystal ball gazing into our future with super-fast broadband. (Download the report here. It’s a big read so go the good exec summary.)

The report offers us the benefit of hindsight, now.

Thank you Phil and IBM for dragging us from the here and now, which already feels so fast and furiously overwhelming, and into the future. I love the future, don’t you? The critical-that-you-get-with-the-hyperconnected-program future.

The gist of it is this: we are not only in the Digital Age – following the Hunting and Trapping, Agrarian and Industrial Ages – but since 2007, fuelled by high-speed broadband, cloud computing, analytics and our general acceleration towards all things digital, we have been in a whole new age. A Hyper Digital Age. How cool is that? A new age. Powered by super fast broadband (why, hello, NBN) and things are gonna get way messy from here, affecting the way society functions, communicates, works, shops and recreates. Phil surmises that this will particularly affect businesses, some of which will not survive unless they go with the flow.

Sure we see the hints already. Death of newsprint. Connected classrooms. Six screens in the average Aussie house. But it is going way further than that and fast, to the point that we will all be in the media game, pumping stories around our increasingly borderless world.

Here’s a few little ideas from the report to whet your appetite:

  • We are fast becoming an exporting nation, but not just what we dig out of he ground. Service exports is the name of the game in the new hyper-connected future – education, business services and health,
  • Our appetite for data is insatiable. Think terabytes soon and petrabytes in my lifetime. I don’t even know what a petrabyte is. (Think of how many photos of cats playing pianos we will need to download in 2030),
  • Every surface is a screen. Including our bodies,
  • Get into healthcare and education and out of video retailing and newspapers. It seems like the most impact will be on media as we know it. Great. And,
  • Mining is OK, Gina.

I’m working with two clients at present – one in property development who doesn’t think they are in media (they are). The other a telco who know they have to be in media but are not certain how (they’ll work it out). Our hyper-connected future is going to change everything about their business models. And they may find that they need one another to survive.

So put the kettle on, put your feet up, read the report and marvel at how rapidly the world is changing before our very eyes.

 

Marketers outsource traditional before online marketing

The number of businesses outsourcing traditional marketing functions is expected to jump over the next 12 to 24 months from 9% currently to 21%, according to IBM’s ‘Australian Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) Research 2012’.

The report, built from a survey of 216 businesses, rates traditional marketing as the fourth most outsourced business process, ahead of digital marketing, which is currently outsourced by a surprisingly low 6% of businesses. Intention to outsource online  marketing over the next year or two is also lower than for traditional, with only 17% anticipating that they will seek external providers.

The greatest share of business for traditional marketing service providers came from the telecommunications and transport industries, with 33% and 31% of businesses in these sectors outsourcing at least one marketing process. In the future, suppliers should look to government and education sectors as their primary sources of outsource business in the future.

Adoption and future adoption of traditional marketing outsourcing across sectors

Traditional outsourcing chart

When it comes to online marketing, telecommunications and transport businesses are the highest current adopters of outsourcing, while, looking forward, telecommunications and banking, financial services and insurance (BFSI) will increase their outsourcing the most.

Adoption and future adoption of online marketing outsourcing across sectors

The BPO report goes on to break down a number of sub-processes for both traditional and online marketing. Market research is the most commonly outsourced traditional sub-process, with 74% outsourcing this function, and also ranks as the sub-process most likely to be outsourced in the future.

Currently 32% outsource content development and 16% outsource campaign management; both of which are expected to be outsourced by more than one in ten who are yet to do so. Customer service is outsourced by 11% of business currently, but a further 21% intend to in the next 12 to 24 months.

Adoption and future adoption of traditional marketing outsourcing by sub-process

Digital marketing is an area where businesses are looking for support due the volume, velocity and variety of data that comes with the territory according to BPO CRM Leader for Growth Markets at IBM Australia, Peter Monk. “The data complexities around it are not something that organisations can or want to get their head into,” Monk says. “They’re saying it’s simply not why they’re in business.”

Social media has been a great influence in driving usage outsourcing of online marketing according to the report. However, the online marketing sub-processes most commonly outsourced currently include multi-channel management at 50%, analytics at 29% and content management at 29%. In the future additional businesses are most likely to outsource content management (21%) and reporting (21%).

Adoption and future adoption of online marketing outsourcing by sub-process

The research also examined online marketing strategies, discovering that most organisations (59%) outsourcing the function have some sort of online marketing strategy. However, these still appear to be in their infancy, with only 7% of organisations that currently outsource online marketing having a constant engagement strategy, and 14% having an active use strategy. One in five do not have a strategy in place and a further 21% have a passive online presence.

 

Consumers keep repertoires of trusted retailers [News + Infographic]

Consumers trust on average only a select few retailers but their trust in merchants has doubled over the past year, according to IBM’s 2012 Smarter Consumer Study.

The findings from the study, conducted with 28,000 consumers including 1800 Australians, show that while retailers remained the least trusted source of information when making a purchase decision, trust in their information or advice more than doubled over the past year, up from 3% to 10%.

Friends and family continue to be the most trusted source of information during the purchase cycle with 51% of Australians nominating this as their most trusted.

To retail and consumer products industry lead for IBM Global Business Services A/NZ, Ian Wong, the findings show consumers only spend with a select few retailers that they trust.

“Trust is a key theme that comes out of this year’s Smarter Consumer Study,” Wong says. “There is a set of values – convenience, community, and trust – which underpin how consumers engage with retailers both online and offline.”

Retailers should no longer be focused on whether their customers are being loyal to them, but whether they are being loyal to their customers – this is a new shift for many.”

With the improvement in trust levels, indications are that a growing number of retailers are successfully engaging with consumers in a more proactive and transparent way.

The study also found that 90% of Australians believe social networks save them time in shopping (compared to 85% of consumers worldwide), while 40% of Australians want to use websites for comparative shopping. However, Australians still value the ‘touch and feel’ element of the shopping experience and say that the store is still the preferred purchase channel.

“In Australia, the physical presence of a retailer is still very important, so it’s not about eradicating bricks and mortar in favour of online. Brands that are truly succeeding are the ones that are delivering a consistent, positive, and personalised experience for customers across various channels – online, mobile, in-store,” Wong says.

“Retailers in Australia are acting on their understanding of the importance of having a cross-channel platform which delivers consistent, positive and personalised experiences to customers. This is a positive progression from last year.”

Commenting on the findings, CEO of the Australian National Retailers Association, Margy Osmond, adds, “Cross-channel retail is proving to be a powerful force in generating competition and innovation, both of which will result in a healthier retail sector. The study shows that it’s a consumer’s market and retailers need to show loyalty back to customers across all channels of engagement.”

Click to view infographic in full screen.

The world’s cartridge – HP brand profile

This feature first appeared in the September 2010 issue of Marketing magazine.

From ‘Halo Rooms’ to Seoul, Sean Greaney takes a look at the many faces of Hewlett-Packard.

“Everything that can go digital, will go digital,” the Israeli messiah repeats to his rapt ‘parishioners’. He has brought the prophecy that ushered in the era of digital print east to Seoul, and stands by it. The messiah is Benny Landa, an Ogilvy-level enigma in the printing world.

In 1977, Landa moved to Israel to found Indigo, a company that would focus on research and development. And for years it did: according to Landa it produced no whole product for 16 years and generated $200 million in that time (he coined the term ‘patent fence’ and owns over 500). In hushed and deferential tones at Seoul’s Grand Hilton I’m told that if I own a printer, Landa probably invented some part of it.

Among his many patented (don’t you forget that!) miracles, Landa is credited with inventing digital offset printing. By extension, that’s a modern marketer’s ability to create personalised direct mail. Seven years later, Hewlett-Packard (HP) would recognise the value of Indigo to the tune of $882 million (after Indigo achieved long-term revenue goals).

Upon acquisition, Landa remarked, “Our vision has always been to lead the printing industry into the digital era and to see Indigo technology pervade the commercial printing market. Now, as part of HP, that goal is in sight.”

The Indigo story mirrors HP’s somewhat, though HP’s is the progenitorial Silicon Valley start-up success fable. When starry-eyed entrepreneurial minds drool over the houses Apple and Microsoft built, they’re really gagging over the second generation.

In 1938, two men, Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard, electrical engineers out of StanfordUniversity, flipped a coin in a one-car garage to determine whose surname would take pride of place in their new company’s brand. Bill won. The garage is now Heritage-listed.

With $538 investment capital, they founded a company that in 2009 would generate US$114, 552 billion in revenue: the world’s largest technology company by revenue – excepting Samsung, the interests of which are even more diverse than HP’s, roaming as wide as real estate.

 

An acolyte of the big idea

In 2002, following its acquisition of Compaq, the brand launched ‘Everything Is Possible’, centred on the equation device ‘(customer) + HP = everything is possible’. It leveraged some of HP’s big clients: the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), Amazon.com, FedEx, DreamWorks, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and Bang & Olufsen. It groped some celebrity brands, but the focus was corporate juggernauts.

At the time, VP of brand and marketing communications Garry Elliot explained the move, saying, “This is the most assertive, creative brand campaign HP has done. We decided the best way to become recognised as the world’s leading technology company was to simply tell it like it is. But rather than focus on what we make, this campaign focuses on what we make possible on behalf of our customers, our clients and our partners.”

Four years later, with a new CEO (more on that later), HP launched ‘The Computer is Personal Again’. This campaign has been a no holds barred, rub-against-as-much-cool-as-possible, celebrity endorsement love-in, albeit a well-executed one. Those lending themselves to the cause include: Jay Z, Jerry Seinfeld, Serena Williams, Vera Wang, Mark Cuban, Pharell, Vivienne Tam, Petra Němcová, Jessica Simpson, the Sex and the City girls, Gwen Stefani, Mark Burnett and Shaun White. And I think I missed some. These endorsements roam from Jay Z’s nonchalant TVC telling us he’s got his “whole life in this thing… new Frank Gehry plans for my team, in Brooklyn… gotta track all my investments ’cause I’m gonna retire, right? Ha. My passport says Shawn, but you may know me by another name,” as “Jay Z, CEO of Hip Hop” pulses toward the screen, to designers sexing up netbooks, to product placement.

Goodby, Silverstein and Partners (GSP) has shown a restraint that probably raised client-side eyebrows in decommodifying product through a more translatable, if perhaps lower-impact, communication than Apple’s lauded campaigns of the noughties: the TVCs deliberately obscure the endorsing celebrity’s face – and the ads are all the more artful and engaging for it. Imitation, flattery and that whole axiom are the true mark of a successful campaign though; it has spawned a few spoofs ostensibly ‘starring’ Bill Gates, Steve Jobs and Keanu Reeves.

Both brand campaigns, they have seen HP climb Interbrand’s ‘Best Global Brands‘ from number 15, valued at US$16.7 million in 2002 to 10th place valued at nearly US$10 million more (although rivals of varying degrees Intel, GE, Microsoft and IBM all place more highly from a brand value perspective). Any CFOs, CSOs or sales directors who’ve wandered into the wrong magazine may balk at my next juxtaposition, but in 2002 HP sat at 28 on the Fortune500. In 2010 its Fortune500 rank matched its ‘Best Global Brands’ rank: 10th.

Both campaigns were developed by GSP; its evolution, and I’d say strategic convergence, is the recently launched ‘Let’s Do Amazing’. Hosted by Rhys Darby – better known as Murray the manager from Flight of the Conchords – the campaigns walk the now very familiar territory of endorsement, this time from Annie Leibovitz, Viacom, DreamWorks, an unnamed, sort of ‘everyman’ financial services company, the International Space Station (!), HP Labs and HP’s CeNSE sensors, United Parcel Service (UPS), Dr Dre, The Venetian Hotel in Las Vegas and Avatar. The difference being the convergence of corporate and celebrity interests alongside media brands, likely moving toward a more cost-effective campaign for both business and consumer audiences.

“From an imaging and printing perspective our strategy is to focus our marketing efforts through the line. For example, in the consumer printing area HP’s focus is on promoting our innovative and leading ‘web printing’ offering and we have done this with some above the line activity in print and digital media, experiential activity focused on high traffic locations where consumers would be to showcase the product, such as airports, press relations activity targeting tech, daily and lifestyle media and in-store activation programs with aggressive promotional offers, sales training and incentive programs for the sales reps on the store floor, as well as point of sale materials that explain the range and highlight the differentiations of HP,” touts Jacqueline Ibrahim, marketing manager, printing and imaging group, South Pacific.

“One program that we have implemented is the HP live demonstration program, which allows consumer and small business users to go into a store and test HP product for themselves. This allows them to test the print quality as well as see a live demonstration of HP’s innovative ePrint and Print Apps available across the new consumer range… We will be expanding this program to include live wireless internet enabled units in-store, which allow us to showcase HP’s innovative web connected printing.”

Pretty standard stuff, eh? But wait, there’s more.

“We are also focused on leveraging social media to communicate our products and technology and will be launching a social activation program partnering with a reputable museum in Melbourne that allows consumers to send their prints via ePrint (simply by sending an email) and watch them being printed in this world famous museum. This is designed to demonstrate and communicate the simplicity of HP’s ePrint technology with the aim of this activity being viral and communicating this value proposition to the masses,” says Ibrahim.

I’ll break one of my rules and call the idea innovative. But HP hasn’t embraced, or at least resourced, social media across the board, or if so has elected to adopt the ostrich strategy regarding negative commentary. The comments to your right, at time of writing were found unanswered (and not unique in that state) on the first page of HP and HP Australia’s Facebook pages.

 

Tough

“The HP board just made the worst personnel decision since the idiots on the Apple board fired Steve Jobs many years ago. That decision nearly destroyed Apple and would have if Steve hadn’t come back and saved them,” wrote Lawrence Ellison, CEO of Oracle and friend of former HP CEO Mark Hurd, to The New York Times (‘former’ following accusations of sexual harassment from HP employee Jodie Fisher, one time reality TV contestant and loosely defined as a ‘marketing contractor’). The allegations were eventually disproven by HP, but a probe did find falsified expense claims concealing a relationship between the two.

“In losing Mark Hurd, the HP board failed to act in the best interest of HP’s employees, shareholders, customers and partners. The HP board admits that it fully investigated the sexual harassment claims against Mark and found them to be utterly false,” continued Ellison.

Hurd’s five years at HP saw a number of successes and tough decisions: he cut 10 percent of the company’s workforce (15,200 people), reduced the number of software applications from 6000 to 1500, halved the IT department to 8000 and shrank the company’s 85 data centres to six. The savings went toward more salespeople.

Facing the recession, he imposed a five percent pay cut on all employees, took a personal cut of 20 percent and, following HP’s acquisition of the company, enforced EDS (Electronic Data Systems) employee salaries into line with HP structures – meaning cuts of up to 20 percent. He then predicted a five percent sales fall, but six percent profit rise. Of course, his 20 percent pay cut was refunded by the compensation committee.

When questioned on the impact the scandal has had on B2B relations, HP declines to comment, but is happy to confirm its partnership with Oracle continues – a significant interest at 140,000 shared customers.

Whatever the impact, Hurd’s ejection was a costly affair at US$34.6 million in severance, options and stock. He’s now residing on Oracle’s board, a tense position given the shared customers and Oracle’s recent acquisition of Sun Microsystems, putting it in direct corporate hardware competition with HP.

United we stand

It’s cold, wet and I’m finding out about the downside of last month’s Superbrand Profile, Vespa, as trucks buffet me about the Burwood Highway. Uncharacteristically running late, I’m ushered rapidly into the apparently heavily booked ‘Halo Room’ for a product-focused session with Ivy Liang, VP of marketing for HP, Asia Pacific and Ibrahim. Liang appears to be sitting about a metre and a half from me, but is actually in a Singaporean ‘Halo Room’: three crisp screens provide a wraparound view of her room, while a fourth above allows those meeting to share videos and presentations. Lag is non-existent.

Every conversation and presentation I am involved with while researching HP focuses on four trends clearly driving the day-to-day, and this meeting is (repeatedly!) no exception: content explosion, mobility, digitisation and moving to a service-based business model. An internally conducted digital content audit predicts that by 2012 available content will have increased tenfold. A function of this, says HP, will be a threefold increase in printed pages, a very important metric. Digitisation refers to the conversion of content and mobility the consumer trend in digital devices.

“A lot of people were asking us: ‘Is printing on a declining trend, since a lot more content is already in a digital format?’ In one way it’s true, the proportion of content being printed out will be less, but, on the other hand, the [amount of] content is increasing 10 times. So the printable content, we’re actually projecting it to increase by three times. So the absolute number is increasing, even though the proportion is decreasing. That’s what we see as the trend,” says Liang.

So while the brand ostensibly believes the world of printed pages is about to swell like so many boab trees, it’s hedging its bets around its golden goose by moving away from a goods focus to services. Or rather, from what I’ve seen, service offerings attached to premium goods.

Partnerships also appear to be a big focus – perhaps a logical step for the voracious acquirer, but, again, more on that later. One such partnership is based around a product I, as a Gen Y male, had never heard of: photo books. An evolution of the photo album, they’re a phenomenon in Japan, Korea and much of Asia. A surprise to me, their popularity has increased, Ibrahim explains, from four percent of Australian households in 2009 to eight in 2010.

“According to PICA 2010, the median number of pictures taken by households with digital cameras was 345. In Australia, 55 percent of households made prints from digital camera images in 2010, and the median number of prints or copies made per household was 100. Australian households typically print 55 percent of the prints they make at home on the computer printer and the remaining 45 percent on a photo-printer designed specifically for a digital camera. Nearly 60 percent of households printing at home used photo paper for all of the prints they make. Photo cards and photo books are the most prominent and popular photo-publishing products in Australia,” says Ibrahim. “The biggest inhibitors for end users are the perception it is difficult, time consuming and expensive.”

This flurry of data has driven partnerships with Kmart, Ted’s Cameras and Camera House, providing kiosks that move the production of these products from the black-rim framed eyes of designers to the bleary eyes of young mothers.

“One of the key limitations for these creative products is people perceive them to be really difficult to create, and actually think it’s really expensive. So one of the things that we’re working on with our partners locally is how can we communicate that this is actually relatively simple, and it also can be done relatively quickly. And a key differentiator for HP’s retail publishing products is it only takes one hour to actually collect your book, and so we’re going out and communicating that a lot. If you go into a Kmart store, you’ll see a lot of messaging around one-hour service. A lot of the communications they’re doing in market is around that, and also the actual software that operates on these kiosks is really easy to use, because that’s another thing that’s really daunting about these photo books: people think they need to be some sort of tech guru to actually work it out. So they’re some of the differentiators of HP, and it is a challenge to communicate that, because you’re trying to get over that hurdle. So we’re doing a number of different things in communicating that through media relations activity as well as when they’re in-store,” explains Ibrahim.

Kmart was selected for its demographic, reach and previous experience with photo labs.

“We actually work together with them to set up the entire store, the entire in-store experience – how do we get the customers, what kinds of solution we want to show to them, who are the customers we want to talk to, and what are the products we want to sell to them, be it photo book, calendar or just a four by six photo,” adds Liang.

Outside of the retail channel, HP has also allied itself with that heroic group, media owners, in its quest to drive a greater volume of printed pages through what it’s calling ‘web connected printing’.

“We work with the content partners… to bring the content basically directly to our customers. So without logging on to the PC or the internet, they’re able to pull the content directly from those content partners and print it out directly,” explains Liang.

“The strategy is driven internally and is very much based on the consumer insight that I shared with you, the four key trends that we see happening. Customers want to have the content in their hand…

“It was launched in North America one year ago, and we discovered that 70 percent of customers who bought printers with this functionality actually print out content from various partners, which is very encouraging. Because, having to be very frank, this is a very new thing; we didn’t know whether people would really print it, or if they wouldn’t use it… On DreamWorks they print out colouring pages and give them to their kids to colour in, and it’s much faster. So we think this is the trend to go, and what will make it successful is to enable our teams in the regions to engage local content partners that have the content that is relevant to the customers locally. So those are the directions that we’re working towards,” she continues.

“In some countries we are working with the country coffee chains to put our printers there, enabling the people who go to the coffee chains [to use them]. That’s what you’re going to see in other markets, including Australia. You will see our printers appearing in places where our customers are travelling, are living, are enjoying or relaxing rather than just in one space,” adds Ibrahim.

The enemy of my enemy

HP’s partnership/endorsement focus is actually indicative of a wider business strategy of acquisition. The brand has been a voracious acquirer, over the years buying up over 100 companies, including big names Compaq (for US$25 billion), Palm (US$1.2 billion), 3Com (US$2.7 billion), Snapfish, Mercury Interactive (US$4.5 billion) the aforementioned Indigo and, in 1958, importantly, FL Moseley Company, which allowed HP to enter the plotter business, plotters being the predecessors to certain printers. According to Fortune magazine, the brand now holds the best profit margins in the printing industry.

Ibrahim points to research from Gartner demonstrating businesses spend as much as three percent of their revenue on printing, once hardware, software, consumables, maintenance and support costs are accounted for. She goes on to reveal the brand has a 34 percent share of the Australian market – that’s a lot of three percents. At Dscoop, obviously speaking of specialist printers, it is revealed HP’s Indigo outsells all of its competitors, combined.

At the professional level, this is driven by the partnership philosophy. The brand consults its customers to reduce costs and optimise its offering. In Asia Pacific, the lifeblood of these customers is marketing collateral, making up 58 percent of the business, followed by labels and packaging (19 percent), photo products (13 percent) and publishing (seven percent), with DM trailing at a surprising four percent. And the region is increasingly becoming the lifeblood of HP Indigo – Chinese sales equalled US in 2010.

Dscoop is another means of partnering through a branded, essentially gated community and encouraging users to create the value of belonging.

On a consumer level, the aforementioned web connected printing and retail channel partners are the driving focus.

“It doesn’t mean that we are not focusing on our core business, which is selling the printer itself, but we want to make sure there is no longer a box that sits in the study room or in the back room. It’s something that can enable the customers to connect to the content they want,” says Liang.

Leaning against the wind, HP believes digitised content hasn’t strangled consumer desire for printed content. Rather it’s a case of removing barriers and personalising that content. A study HP commissioned across Asia Pacific found that 75 percent of customers in possession of a smartphone, or related mobile device, want to print from it. The solution? Give printers their own email address.

“So if I want to print something to Jacqueline from the printers that she owns, as long as I know the email address of her printers, I can print directly from my smartphone, all kinds of smartphones, to Jacqueline’s ePrint enabled printers,” say Liang.

“Our fundamental strategy is to convert analogue pages to digital and to enable new types of digital pages. We’re especially focused on high-value pages such as colour and variable data,” adds Ibrahim.
“Because of all these changes, the way we do marketing is also very different. So gone are the days that we only do product launches and that we just tell them all the product features and the benefits. We truly want to move into the customer’s experience, dialogue and discussions. It’s a lot more interaction with the customers that we want to generate. So you will see a lot more marketing activity, not just at the advertising level, but more… at places, physical places where our customers live their life and consume that content,” proselytises Liang.The brand believes it can move the printer out of the office and into the centre of the household as a content generator of sorts.

 

 

Allies

Technology brands don’t do a lot above the line in this country. When it comes to personal computers, we tend to sit in camps by operating systems divided: you either back a fruit or that rich guy. And that’s really determined by personal situation, influenced a little by word of mouth and viral content.

HP’s decommodification in markets the scale of which justifies it, is elegant. But the brand’s pre-emptive defence of its bread and butter, printed pages, is an unexpected mirror and ally to traditional media’s own challenges. Those partnerships may be an inroad to influencing consumer decisions in smaller scale markets beyond allegiances to Seven or OS X, black or aluminium, John Hodgman or Justin Long. Those partnerships will likely prove more important than the omnipresent ‘four trends’. And I’m sure HP knows it.

That bearded prophet Benny Landa put it best for him pulpit in Seoul: “The best deal isn’t the one that looks best at face value, but the one that makes the other person believe they got the best deal.”

IBM: Retailers must adapt for the smart consumer

It is not news to retailers that the way consumers shop has changed, but few retailers are making the changes necessary to capitalise on today’s smarter consumer, according to a report from IBM.

‘Capitalising on the Smarter Consumer’, from IBM’s Institute for Business Value, describes the modern day shopper as a super consumer who trusts friends over retailers and knows what they want before they hit the shops, changing the role of the salesperson from sell to serve.

According to the report, the in-store shopper no longer wants to be told what to buy; they want to be empowered to make their own decisions and to make the purchase as quickly and easily as possible.

One of the key reasons behind this shift was identified as a lack of trust – only 13% of consumers believe product information from retailers and manufacturers, and one in two wouldn’t give a retailer their primary email address if asked.

These changes to the consumer psyche have accelerated the shopping process from browsing through shops, finding something and buying it in a continuous sequence, to a process that becomes a series of moments where the consumer dips in and out wherever and whenever it suits them.

“What was once an uninterrupted flow is becoming a series of moments – the moment the consumer first becomes aware of a new product, the moment he or she researches it, the moment of purchasing it and the moment he or she takes possession of it. These moments may be separated by days or weeks,” the report reads.

“This process has not only become more fragmented, it has also become compressed. The retailer’s window of opportunity to influence a potential customer is shrinking from hours to minutes.”

To capitalise on this style of purchasing cycle the report suggests retailers make it as easy as possible for consumers to complete the shopping process by providing the right services and letting consumers choose how they interact.

For instance, more than 40% of the people surveyed want to check product prices wherever they are and get promotions based on the items they scan. A growing proportion of consumers want to buy products online and have them delivered on the date they specify. And 50% are willing to use a personal mobile device to avoid the checkout lane.

The findings also reveal that today’s consumer purchases for a wider range of family members, whether or not they share a roof. Over 20% of respondents said they regularly bought clothing, groceries, consumer electronics and personal care products for their parents.

The report identifies two key strategies for retailers looking to capitalise on smart consumers:

1. Recognise that they have become active, not passive, participants in the purchase cycle and give them the facilities they need to participate in the process while making them feel like it is your pleasure to serve them, and

2. know when consumers are buying products for themselves, when they are buying products for others, when they are experiencing life-changing events and when and where they want to make the purchase.

 

The IBM Institute for Business Value executive report, ‘Capitalising on the Smarter Consumer,’ is available here.