Ipsos hires Fairfax exec to lead new readership metric

Research firm Ipsos has installed Fairfax Media executive Simon Wake to lead the new print readership survey when it is released in the coming months.

Wake will move from marketing and circulation director at The Financial Review Group to oversee release of the new readership metric, produced in conjunction with The Readership Works to replace Roy Morgan Research’s criticised readership study.

The publishing industry is undergoing significant change as it adapts to new audience behaviours, Wake says. “Publishers are responding quickly through new developments in printed and digital platforms and our research will provide the most accurate measure of consumer behaviour across these multiple-platforms for publishers and advertisers.”

“Wake will bring a wealth of experience to bear on the development of this new survey and we look forward to bringing new insights to the market in the near future,” Ipsos’ soon-to-be ex-CEO adds. Amoyal is set to move on to another role in the company, The Australian reports.

Wake spent nine years with Fairfax, following roles with ANOP Research Services and Millward Brown in Australia and the UK. He will head up Ipsos’ MediaCT division as managing director.

The Readership Works metric is set to launch before the end of June, responding to criticisms that Roy Morgan’s measure overstates the number of readers.

Ipsos is yet to announce a new CEO.

Google study: Content is King, the screen is Queen and context is God

Forget second screen behaviour – a study from Google in the US shows audiences splintering across four connected screens to consume digital content, with context deciding which screen fits best.

Smartphones, tablets, desktop computers and connected TVs are the four devices being used across different occasions, but their power to marketers lies in how they are used together, the study of 1611 Americans found.

The device chosen by multi-screen-owning consumers depends on the context – the amount of time available for the task, the goal of the task, the consumer’s location and their attitude or state of mind. Desktop computers are most commonly chosen for productivity or more detailed information tasks, smartphones to stay connected or for short bursts of activity, and tablets and smart TVs for entertainment.

In combination, 90% of all media consumption, or 4.4 hours per day, occurs across these four screens, but the most important device is the smartphone due to its tendency to initiate tasks that snowball on to other screens, or as Google calls it, ‘sequential device usage’.

In addition, smartphones are the most common sidekick device accessed for ‘simultaneous usage’ with other screens – the other mode of multiscreening identified in the report

The implication highlighted by the report is that while the total content experience doesn’t need to be designed for smartphone, the initial and the accompanying parts should be, and integrated into how that content might be used on other devices.

google multi study 2

The study found that while users are watching TV the most of any screen – on average for 43 minutes per session – 77% of that time is shared with the use of another device.

Desktops – PCs or laptops – enjoy the next most involved sessions, usually lasting 39 minutes each. Tablets and smartphones command shorter sessions again, with 30 minutes and 17 minutes spent per session respectively.

Google multi study

The study, conducted in conjunction with market analysts Ipsos and Sterling Brands, polled 1611 people across 15,738 media interactions and nearly 8000 hours of activity during quarter two of 2012.

 

Parents claim immunity to junk food ads (and pester power)

Junk food advertising is not contributing to obesity levels among children in the minds of Australian parents who believe they’re not influenced by ads in making dietary choices for their children.

A study into the attitudes of parents, conducted by Ipsos for the Australian Association of National Advertisers (AANA) in April 2012, found that 70% of parents believe advertising has no influence over their food and beverage purchase decisions.

CEO of the AANA, Scott McClellan, says the survey confirms that parents are not ignorant or ill-informed when it comes to making healthy food choices, despite what some health sector lobbyists would have us believe. “In fact, 94% of parents feel they are well informed when it comes to making decisions about their children’s diet.”

“For the vast majority of people, advertising only helps determine choice of brand but it doesn’t determine choice of food type to any meaningful extent.’

Nutrition emerged as the top determinant of food choice for parents, with 32% of parents claiming it had the most influence on their purchasing decision, while 26% claimed price and 16% claimed taste were the most influential factors. Marketing and advertising were cited by only 3% of parents as the top factor influencing their choice.

“We know parents are clearly concerned about the effect advertising may have on their children and that is why advertisers need to be conscious of their commitments to only advertise healthier food choices to children,” McClellan adds. The AANA has two codes of conduct relevant to food advertising to children – the Code of Advertising & Marketing Communications to Children and AANA Food and Beverage Advertising Code.

Almost three quarters of parents surveyed believe that 60% or more of Australians are overweight. This correlates closely with the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) National Health Survey 2007-08 data, which showed that the proportion of Australian adults who were overweight or obese was 61%.

 

 

Mobile commerce taking off among smartphone owners

Google has release data on mobile commerce behaviour as well as other aspects of mobile phone usage, in a study that focusses solely on smartphones.

Our Mobile Planet’, conducted in quarter one of 2012, discovered that 28% of smartphone owners have purchased a product or service on their device, of which 60% had made a recent purchase.

Among mobile shoppers there exists a hard-core group of users who purchase from their mobile frequently: 8% do so daily and a further 10% on a weekly basis. Mixed payment methods are used, with 60% using PayPal, but 48% also using credit or debit cards. A select few opt for an invoice or to complete the transaction using a gift card or web payment.

The barriers to making a purchase were investigated among those that were yet to do so, revealing that 68% simply prefer their PC or laptop to buy online, 36% don’t feel secure making the purchase on their device, 11% found it too complicated and 6% found the payment process specifically too complex.

Why have you not made a purchase using your smartphone?

Our Mobile Planet chart

Looking forward, 28% expect to make more purchases via their smartphone in the next twelve months, 45% do not expect to start accessing mobile stores, and a further 27% were unsure how their mobile commerce behaviour would evolve.

The study was commissioned by Google and conducted by Ipsos MediaCT in partnership with the Mobile Marketing Association and the Interactive Advertising Bureau.

 

Print measurement to go deeper

Australian print media companies are soon to be introduced to a new readership measurement tool, to be developed by Ipsos.

Once developed, the tool will deliver sectional information and will aim to provide more frequent data releases. There is also the possibility of measurement of newspapers and magazines across multiple platforms, including print, online and mobile.

According to Mary-Ellen Vincent, managing director at Ipsos, Australia was considered to be at the leading edge of readership measurement. “It has long been apparent that while the world of publishing and advertising has advanced rapidly, the audience measurement that fuels this world has not.” Vincent said.

Ipsos MediaCT global chief marketing officer, Andrew Green said that a key change for the new survey is that it will be the industrys survey, not the vendors. “We plan to consult widely with publishers, agencies and advertisers as we fine-tune the various elements of the project.”

Love, loyalty and polygamy

In an Ipsos ‘Australian Loyalty Study’, Australians were touted as being more loyal to both family and brands, than they were two years ago. Lara Stocchi, research associate at Ehrenberg-Bass Institute for Marketing Science, answers back:

Loyalty does exist. Consumers are loyal, but perhaps not in the traditional till-death-do-us-part way. Consider it polygamous loyalty…

It’s loyalty, but not as you know it

Marketers spend a lot of time focusing on brand loyalty. New studies, like the latest Ipsos’ study, report findings that Aussies are becoming more loyal – but are they? In all of the data that we’ve seen, from breakfast cereal to cars, even store choice, the patterns are the same. Loyalty is everywhere… depending on your definition of loyalty that is.

Let’s be pragmatic. Do we really buy only one brand of milk or butter our whole lives? Even if this means ignoring the appeal and convenience of price promotions for a substitute brand? Are we devastated when the chocolate bar we’re craving is not available at the only late night convenience store on the way home? Do we drive an extra 15 minutes to the next supermarket if our favourite cereal is out of stock? No, not often.

Polygamy is the norm

Traditional ‘till-death-do-us-part loyalty’ (brand-monogamy) is very rare. Over time, we end up trying out a few different options in any category we regularly shop from. But that is not to say that we’re promiscuous: we don’t use every single option available to us. Real loyalty lies somewhere in the middle of the two extremes.

Most people are polygamous loyal shoppers. In each category we develop a personal repertoire of preferred brands and we shuffle amongst this repertoire according to countless contingency factors like availability and promotions.

This pattern of buying has been observed across countries and categories over the past five decades. It is well documented in academic research on buyer and consumer behaviour, even if countless studies choose to ignore it. But some large marketing organisations have taken this empirical knowledge on board and are using it to their advantage (including some of the biggest FMCGs like Procter & Gamble and Kraft).

Wise marketers

According to the same Ipsos loyalty study, “88% of Australians say they are more loyal to their spouse than they were two years ago”. Apparently, along with lots of other loyalty items (cars, coffees, employers etc) most respondents declared themselves more loyal to their partners than two years ago. Studies that compare brands to relationships usually worry me. That said, given the context, I just can’t help doing the same. Samuel Johnson wisely said: “Wise married women dont trouble themselves about infidelity in their husbands”. I would like to add: “Wise marketers don’t trouble themselves about infidelity in their customers.”

Qantas wins World Cup

Qantas has been awarded first and third place for its TVCs screened on SBS during the 2010 World Cup, reported research firm Ipsos.

In a review of 26 TVCs broadcast on SBS during the World Cup, Qantas achieved first place for its ‘A380 business’ ad and third place with its ‘I still call Australia home’ ad. McDonalds came in second place with its ‘Supporting the supporters by being open late’ execution. World Cup themed ads scored higher in the review than those that didn’t capitalise on the theme.

“Many of the global brands have not altered the ads for the local market and as a result consumers felt they were generic soccer ads. This is where McDonald’s did so well. They recognised the time zone difference for the Aussie soccer fans and addressed this in their ads, said Ipsos ASI executive director Peter Fairbrother.

The review took the form of an online survey of 1,000 respondents between 18-64 years old who had watched the World Cup.

Aussies becoming more loyal

Ipsos’ ‘Australian Loyalty Study’ has found that Australians are more loyal across the board than they were two years ago.

Topping the list, 88% of Australians say they are more loyal to their spouse than they were two years ago.

In the consumer realm, 76% of Australians are loyal to the brand of car they drive, 67% to their coffee shop and 65% to their financial institution.

On most items relating to the concept of loyalty, from Loyalty to employer to Loyalty not being an old-fashioned concept, Gen Y was significantly more positive.

“This was a shocking finding as most of us in the Loyalty business believed Gen Y generally had an inflated sense of entitlement so we expected their loyalty scores to be lowest. In fact, they were most favourable to the concept of loyalty and stated more loyalty to brands and employer than Gen X and in many cases Baby Boomers. It may come as a surprise to some that Gen Y is the most likely to remain loyal to their employer even if they are offered a higher paying job elsewhere,” said Brett Tucker, head of loyalty at Ipsos.

Despite this, 45% of Australians do not believe organisations do a good job of encouraging loyalty with their customers and 47% say organisations don’t do a good job of properly recognising and rewarding loyal customers.

On the employment front, 55% of Australians indicated they would remain loyal to their current workplace if they were offered a position elsewhere – even if the hypothetical position included a 10% pay rise.

Cokes ad hottest at Winter Olympics

Ipsos has awarded Coca-Cola, Birds Eye and AAMI gold, silver and bronze medals respectively for their advertising during the broadcast of the 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics.

The study reviewed the performance of 40 different TVCs over the course of the broadcast. The research measured awareness, recognition, branding and impact on consumers with regard to relevance and persuasion.

Interestingly, Ipsos reports that none of the top 10 ads from the Winter Olympics were Olympic themed, juxtaposed with the Beijing games where two of the top three TVCs were. Of the 40 ads tested from the Winter games, only two were Olympic themed.

“During the 2008 Beijing Games Coca-Cola aired a specifically themed ad ‘Bird’s Nest’ which only ranked 43 out of 60,” said Ipsos ASI executive director Peter Fairbrother. “However, the company took a different stance this time by showing its feel good ‘Summer’ ad. This ad is superbly branded and goes to show that Olympic sponsorship and Olympic themed creative is not a sure fire way to guarantee advertising success.”

Ipsos report a standout comparison between Summer and Winter Olympic advertising being the respective computer sponsors, Lenovo and Acer. Lenovo ranked second during the Beijing games, while Acer only made number 28. Ipsos indicate this was due to Lenovo’s stronger integration of product and message. Acer’s brand linkage was “deemed below average and there was also brand confusion.”

Top 10 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics TVCs

  1. Summer for Coke
  2. Birds 45 Sec for Birds Eye
  3. AAMI Safe Driver for AAMI
  4. Chanting Big Mac for McDonalds
  5. Ford Territory for Ford
  6. Meadow Lea Small Things for Goodman Fielder
  7. John West Salmon for John West/Simplot
  8. Panadol Optisorb for GlaxoSmithKline
  9. Cricket for Kirks
  10. White Water Rafting for Bundaberg Beer