Competitive advantage through marketing education

by Dr Chris Baumann and Dr Francis Yue

 

Business and marketing education always has a key theme across all courses depending on the current state of the economy. When I (the first author) did my undergraduate degree in the 1990s, that theme was cost cutting and cost control. Then when I did my MBA in Canada, that theme was ‘competitive advantage’, and now it seems in Australia we focus on sustainability. My recent teaching for Macquarie University in our Hong Kong program made me rethink the priorities in business and marketing education.

Sustainability is important, but sustainability of what? No doubt environmental concerns must be a focus in society, but increasingly the question is also how to create sustainability of economic progression for countries and firms alike. In order to prepare future leaders for an increasingly competitive global environment, business education must play a key role in generating a competitive advantage, and Hong Kong is an interesting role model in this regard.

Marketing in Hong Kong is fiercely competitive, reflecting equally competitive East Asian markets in Mainland China, Taiwan, and also Korea and Japan. Students in East Asia are exposed to intense competition starting from their elementary school right through to their high school days, often peaking in rigorous university entrance exams. Once accepted into university programs, students face competition for scholarships and top of the class rankings that will ultimately lead to postgraduate studies or a top job upon graduation.

Table 1: Distribution of educational attainment of Hong Kong population aged 15+

Table 1

Source: Education Bureau, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region

Table 2:  Australian education participation rates (by age)

Table 2

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics (May 2011 data)

While in Hong Kong the percentage of the adult population attaining post-secondary degrees has increased from 15.8% in 2006 to 19.6% in 2011 (Table 1), in contrast an astonishing 40.4% of 20 to 24 year olds in Australia study at the tertiary level (Table 2). This also means that competition in Hong Kong is much fiercer in terms of university entry, much fiercer within the program, and fiercer to obtain funding for postgraduate studies such as a Master or Doctoral degrees.

The competitive environment in Hong Kong’s education system ultimately results in a very competitive workforce since the entire education and business system focuses on performance. For example at Cathay Pacific, Hong Kong’s major airline, each and every flight attendant is selected and trained to aspire to provide a service resulting in full customer satisfaction and ultimately customer loyalty. The goal is to be better than the competition. This service-oriented attitude and behaviour in turn creates a competitive advantage for the airline, and ultimately, if all firms generate such competitive advantages, then global competitiveness for Hong Kong is achieved.

Australian education focuses less on competition but has a strong emphasis on social inclusion and opening avenues for students to apply for some form of special consideration when performance is weak due to personal circumstances. In East Asia, in contrast, special consideration is only granted due to medical emergencies, and the difference in competitiveness is also reflected in the diverging performance evaluation systems.

Grading can follow either a ‘norm referencing approach’ or a ‘criterion referencing approach’. Norm referenced assessments ultimately rank students’ performance, resulting in a bell curve (or normal distribution). This means that performance is assessed relative to other students and as such is competitive. In contrast, the criterion referencing approach assesses students’ performance based on clearly stated criteria and standards. Under this approach, performance is assessed in absolute terms, regardless of other students, and is thus generally less competitive.

Performance of students at Australian universities is often based on the less-competitive criterion referencing method, but in Hong Kong, performance is generally assessed based on the norm referencing approach. The question is, however, which system reflects the global competitive business and marketing environment more accurately, where in simple terms, Employee A has to be better than Employee B, and Firm A has to be better than Firm B?

At Cathay Pacific (where employees have experienced the norm referencing approach while at school/university), each flight attendant goes out of their way to please, to be better than the competition. Contrast this to my recent experience on a Qantas flight. When passengers boarded the plane, flight attendants gathered in the galley for a private chat, but there was little formal greeting of passengers. Based on the criterion referencing approach, Qantas flight attendants get a tick for this attitude and behaviour. They were wearing the required uniform and were present on board: criteria fulfilled. But from a norm referencing approach (so putting their performance in relation to the competition), there was insufficient greeting of passengers with no offering of help with finding seats or storing luggage. Impeccable customer service, however, is standard with competing award-winning Asian carriers such as Cathay Pacific, Asiana (in Korea) or Singapore Airlines that all understand their key competitive advantage: a positive and memorable in-flight experience.

Why is the level of service quality in East Asia so high, so competitive? The East Asian education system focuses on performance and discipline, preparing students for a competitive business and marketing environment. Educators in Hong Kong/China, Korea and Singapore understand that intelligence and acquiring knowledge and skills are no longer sufficient to be globally competitive. Education needs to reflect the competitive environment to prepare students for a fiercely competitive workforce and business environment. Education and corporate training need to instil a ‘passion to perform’ such as is showcased in Asian hospitality at airlines, hotels and restaurants.

Education ought to prepare graduates to generate future competitive advantages, and such preparation must occur at various levels: schools, universities, and corporate training. If education passes on a positive performance (and service) attitude, aspiration, professional manners and courtesy, then economic sustainability can be achieved through the creation of competitive advantages.

 

Dr Chris Baumann is a senior lecturer at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia. His research includes customer loyalty, competitiveness in education and society, ethnic marketing, and East Asia (China and Korea). He has been appointed as a visiting professor at Seoul National University (SNU) in South Korea and at Aarhus University in Denmark.

Dr Francis Yue is a senior lecturer at City University of Hong Kong and a programme leader at SCOPE (School of Continuing and Professional Education). His research interests include assessment of student performance and customer relationship management.

Melbourne Business School named in global top 10 for marketing

The Financial Times has rated the Melbourne Business School’s marketing teaching as among the best in the world, as part of its global study of MBA courses.

According to the Financial Times Global MBA Ranking 2012, Australia’s leading MBA schools are mixing it with the world’s best.

In the FT survey, which collected data from more than 20,000 ‘class of 2008′ alumni of the world’s leading business schools, the Australian School of Business (AGSM) at the University of New South Wales ranked 41st overall, while the Melbourne Business School at the University of Melbourne followed close behind at 46th.

Dean of the Melbourne Business School, Professor Zeger Degraeve says the school’s strengths in marketing are recognised by students and employers: “Our marketing faculty members are renowned for their excellence in research, and their unrivalled connections through their consulting and executive education work,” Degraeve says.

Students who completed their MBA at the Melbourne Business School in 2008 now earn an average salary of US$110,978, slightly below their AGSM counterparts who take home an average of US$ 118,943 per year.

89% of Melbourne Business School graduates were employed after 3 months, compared to 93% for AGSM.

Compared to the top marketing schools around the globe, Australian salaries are not too far behind. Students from the top placed marketing school (Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University) earn an average of US$145,834, while the average across the top ten marketing schools is US$120,612.

In the overall MBA rankings, Stanford Graduate School of Business came in on top, followed by Harvard Business SchoolUniversity of Pennsylvania: WhartonLondon Business School and Columbia Business School.

Accordingly, the highest earning 2008 alumni hail from Stanford, taking home US$191,657 per year on average.

The study also looks at value for money, career progression and placement success forAGSM and Melbourne Business School.

Marketing education feature: The Independent

This article is part 4 of 4 on marketing education and qualifications that first appeared in the June 2011 issue of Marketing magazine, comprising four perspectives: The Researcher, The Boss, The Educator/Practitioner and The Independent.

 

The Independent

Linda Loose, DM Hall of Fame honouree, is a failed New York cabaret singer who found her truer calling in direct/digital marketing. One-time GM JWT Direct NY and Australia, she now dishes out independent advice, creative and training to marketers looking for better measurable results. You can contact her via linda@lindaloose.com

Jonathan Pratt, marketing director of StudyLink, a service provider to the international education sector, already knew a bit about higher education qualifications before he decided to further his own. This UK import and former international marketing manager at Monash University says he didn’t have to think too hard about which qualification he’d pursue.

“I completed the Chartered Institute of Marketing (CIM) Professional Diploma in the UK and really enjoyed it,” Pratt explains. “It was more rigorous and challenging than most academic work I’ve done. The networks I developed from it have been exceptionally valuable. And there’s nothing else that’s recognised around the world like this is.”

So when Pratt decided to pursue his next educational milestone here in Australia, he went to the Australian College of Marketing (ACM) – the only CIM accredited study centre in this country. He’s currently working toward his next CIM qualification – the Chartered Postgraduate Diploma in Marketing. And he says he’s finding the experience here just as challenging, and rewarding.

Pratt is just one of the ACM students and graduates I’ve been chatting with about their educational experiences. As a sometimes teacher, and perpetual student, I was intrigued when I heard that this globally recognised qualification had finally come to our shores. And I thought I’d dig a bit deeper into just what CIM and this ‘chartered marketer’ stuff was all about.

 

World’s oldest and largest body for professional marketers

When Carmen Sederino, bathroom field marketing manager at Reece, decided she needed further marketing qualifications to advance in her career, she did some serious homework into the CIM. And from an international colleague who she called on to investigate – a respected trainer from the UK – she got an enthusiastic thumbs-up. Which is just what a lot of overseas marketers would expect.

Established almost 100 years ago, the UK-based CIM now has 300 study centres worldwide, supporting over 50,000 marketers each year. Mention ‘chartered marketer’ in London or Hong Kong or any of 55 countries where CIM has a presence, and it’s instantly acknowledged, commonly understood and well-respected.

Here in Australia, the Australian College of Marketing, established in 2009, offers four CIM professional marketing qualifications on a pathway to chartered marketer status. Included is a world first – a dual award offered in conjunction with Charles Sturt University that leads to a combined Master of Management (Chartered Marketer) and CIM Postgraduate Diploma in Marketing.

Though the CIM chartered marketer status isn’t as widely recognised here yet, it’s well-known among a cadre of cluey marketers who’ve come across it elsewhere in the world – and among its growing stable of Australian students and graduates and their employers.

Here’s what they say makes it a cut above. (Upfront admission: I’m talking with the converted here! These marketers are dead keen on ACM, the CIM, the coursework and what it’s done for them professionally and personally. And, after talking with them, I’m feeling the love myself.)

 

That ‘chartered marketer’ status

Australian marketers have been banging on about it forever. Marketing, the profession, needs and deserves more consistent, concrete and recognisable standards – and greater profile and status within the business and boardroom. But I’ve always questioned whether ‘accreditation’ is part of the answer. Could our yin/yang, right brain/left brain discipline really be shoehorned into the same kind of standardised assessment that’s applied to more black and white fields like accounting and engineering?

Well, these folks are winning me over. The rigour of the CIM approach to marketing education is well-honed. So is the consistency in content and assessment. And, importantly, those with chartered credentials or working toward them say it makes a real difference to how they’re perceived in the workplace.

Kate Liscombe, marketing adviser at consulting engineers Golder Associates, is currently studying for the CIM Professional Diploma. “Around here, it’s instantly understood,” she says. “It’s not about the status of one university or another. Especially among the chartered engineers and scientists I work with, it conveys immediate credibility, and helps me explain where marketing fits and what we’re doing.” Liscombe’s boss, Corey Simpson, takes that a step further. Simpson says that, as a result of her professional development at ACM, “Kate has played a key part in building the credibility of the marketing function at Golder.”

Of course, that’s not just because ‘chartered’ is in the name. What seems to be impressing both students and their employers is the quality of the work resulting from their learning.

 

Bloody hard – and so it should be

One thing with which everyone I speak with concurs is the rigour and depth of the coursework. Every module is exhaustive, every assessment demanding, with some downright daunting. (Emma Blackburn, ACM’s principal, is not shy about reporting that one of the most challenging modules has sometimes had just a 50 percent first-time pass rate worldwide.)

This may not appeal to the student who wants creds on the business card without putting in the hard yards. But for those who want learning that actually makes them demonstrably better at their job – and more promotable to the next one – it’s a large part of the appeal.

Pratt, who is no stranger to higher level academic qualifications, goes so far as to say, “The level of analysis and interpretation, the assessments, the depth of learning and degree of difficulty is greater on the CIM Postgraduate Diploma I’m taking now than for any Masters in Marketing.”

To him, this is a very good thing.

Appealing too is the fact that the standards established for each unit and qualification level are consistent across CIM study centres worldwide – providing a sort of shorthand ‘skill and knowledge’ meter for any employer anywhere in the world looking at an Australian CV.

But perhaps the most enthusiastic praise I hear from everyone involved is for the actual course content and teaching – how different and productive their ACM studies are compared to their other academic or industry education experiences.

 

A dose of vocational reality

A core principle underpinning the CIM approach is that all qualifications are developed in consultation with business and taught by practising marketers. ACM may have lofty academic standards, but it’s also firmly grounded in the real business world: the current trends, the daily demands on working marketers, and the ever-changing knowledge and skills requirements of their employers.

Each course also involves the students in work-based assignments, so they’re applying the tools and disciplines they’re mastering to live issues and data from their own organisations. And each module builds directly on the previous one, carrying those work-based assignments forward to successive levels of analysis and interpretation.

OK, I know, this sounds whizzy on paper. But what does it really mean?

Every student or grad I hear from says some version of the same thing: they have been given tools, skills and real work they have taken directly into their workplaces and used to further their companies’ fortunes – and their own.

Now, I’m never happy with generalities. So I ask, “What exactly did you use back at work, give me an example?” and “What specific difference did it make?” I get some very specific answers (see sidebar).

 

Flexibility of study

ACM courses are structured as a combination of intensive face-to-face study days and ongoing distance learning – ideal for those who want to do the highest level learning, but have work and other commitments that make full-time, scheduled university study impractical. And they benefit from small class sizes, lots of interaction during and after the intensive face-to-faces and extensive personal support from the tutor. Students tell me that this flexible format worked a treat for them.

 

And, of course, the network

ACM graduates, like any students, value highly the cadre of marketing peers and friends they connect with during their study. What sets the CIM network apart is its wide global embrace. Graduates have affiliation with all CIM graduates worldwide, as well as permanent access to the organisation’s substantial online tools and resources, and entrée to ongoing networking and education events in Australia.

 

The best testimonial

For all the enthusiasm of students and graduates, perhaps the best advertisement for ACM and the CIM qualifications comes from the people they work for. For CIM Professional Diploma student Fiona Coles, a marketing executive at Shoal Bay Resort and Spa, one direct result of her study was particularly sweet. She used her coursework to prepare the submission that won her employer a New South Wales Tourism Award. But even sweeter is hearing what her boss, marketing manager Rebecca Smith, has to say: “Fiona’s CIM study has definitely contributed to her success. It has pushed her to challenge processes and policies, encouraged her to look for best practice and provided her with a solid overall business perspective, which allows her to operate effectively within the broader business team.”

And that, I’d venture, is what serious marketing education is all about.

Marketing education feature: The Educator/Practitioner

This article is part 3 of 4 on marketing education and qualifications that first appeared in the June 2011 issue of Marketing magazine, comprising four perspectives: The Researcher, The Boss, The Educator/Practitioner and The Independent.

 

The Educator/Practitioner

Frank Chamberlin is a part-time lecturer in the Master of Marketing at Monash University and runs the 12-year-old writing consultancy, Action Words – www.actionwords.com.au.

Do postgrad studies bridge the gap between academic theory and practical, real-world knowledge? Can postgrad study turbo charge your career in marketing?

To get a feel for these questions, I speak with academics, recruiters and graduates from postgrad courses.

We begin with a view from the US. The Golden Gate University in San Francisco has been educating adult learners since 1910. It currently offers a Master of Science in Marketing and a Master of Science in Integrated Marketing Communications. As the associate professor and chair of Marketing and Public Relations at Golden Gate, Dr Blodwen Tarter suggests that there are a number of reasons to consider postgrad education in marketing.

“For recent graduates with little or no work experience, postgrad training can help jump-start their careers with first-time jobs at a higher level of professional challenge,” she says. “In addition, some practising marketers want to deepen their understanding of specific aspects of marketing and broaden their skill set, while others are seeking formal education to help them transition from one professional discipline to another.”

Tarter sees the question of why people take on postgrad study as quite clear cut. “It’s simple,” she says, “people seek graduate marketing education to get better jobs, faster, and to be more attractive to employers.”

The largest marketing faculty within an Australian university is at Monash University. The director of teaching and learning at Monash, Irene Powell, suggests that the providers of marketing education need to listen to the marketplace.

“It’s important to listen and to ensure that what is taught is relevant, not just for today, but more importantly for the future,” she says. “This is particularly important in dynamic areas such as digital and social media.”

From her years at Monash, Powell suggests that the future of postgrad marketing education is healthy.

“The need for smart, well-disciplined and capable marketing graduates is strong. But the links between industry and academia need to be nurtured. Both parties will benefit from working closer together in the future, for example, on joint research initiatives.”

Mount Eliza Executive Education has been offering management education for 50 years. The director of marketing there, Alex Christou, puts the focus more directly on course content. He sees the role of postgrad education “as equipping marketers not only with the traditional domains of marketing such as brand management, promotional strategies, channel relationships and product positioning, but to also address a number of other competencies that are required by all marketers. These include the ability to manage and lead teams, communicate effectively in the language of economics, finance and organisational change, and to understand the implications of business decisions.”

Christou stresses the need for marketers “to understand and speak the language of our peers around the executive table, such as the chief financial officer and the HR director”.

With almost 300,000 employees around the world and a rich tradition going back to 1890, GE is renowned for the professional development opportunities it offers.

GE obviously recruits people at all levels, but where people join the company with postgrad education, GE is likely to build on that no matter what the content of the course.

As the recruitment manager in Melbourne, Rebecca Dakin explains, “One of our internal leadership courses, called the Experienced Commercial Leadership Program, is particularly developed with postgrad qualified candidates in mind. This program is rotation-based with sales and marketing streams and gives participants the opportunity to undertake formal training in the US before completing rotations within the Australian and New Zealand businesses. The benefit for people who have completed postgrad studies is that this program provides access to senior leaders and commercial projects from their very first day at GE.”

For potential postgrad students, the views of recruiters may be the most valued. Sarah Cockell Consulting is a recruiting firm with offices in Sydney and Melbourne that specialises in direct marketing and online recruitment. Managing director, Louise McCallum says that experience will always outweigh any sort of qualifications. “If there is a choice between a highly qualified candidate with no experience versus a candidate with substantial experience, the experienced candidate would definitely be the first choice,” she says.

McCallum adds, however, “Qualifications certainly do enhance a CV. They add credibility and show a high level of commitment and ambition, which is very desirable to employers.”

Erin Devlin, founding director at the boutique recruitment firm, Devlin Alliance, tends to agree. “Candidates who pursue postgrad qualifications in marketing will gain a greater understanding of the complexities of marketing strategy and implementation,” she explains.

“If candidates are seeking speedier career progression through postgrad marketing qualifications, I don’t believe this is the right vehicle. If, however, they are genuinely interested in gaining a deeper understanding of marketing theory and strategy, and have a long-term view of their careers, then postgrad qualifications can be a worthwhile investment.”

But Devlin stresses that the content needs to be extremely current. “Marketing innovation moves at such lightning speed, that there must be an emphasis on current trends, information and communication methods,” she says.

Perhaps the final word should go to the following four marketers, who are all satisfied that their postgrad course helped them achieve what they wanted.

Marketing education feature: The Boss

This article is part 2 of 4 on marketing education and qualifications that first appeared in the June 2011 issue of Marketing magazine, comprising four perspectives: The Researcher, The Boss, The Educator/Practitioner and The Independent.

 

The Boss

Adam Joseph is readership director at HWT (News Limited), a Victorian councillor with the AMI, a certified practising marketer (CPM), a past graduate of the Chartered Institute of Marketing (CIM) and a lover of three-letter acronyms. 

Being European and multilingual (and, more to the point, having access to Wikipedia), I can reliably inform you, dear readers, that the word ‘charter’ comes from the Latin word meaning ‘little paper’. In other words, a charter started out as just a humble piece of dead wood. And a charter is a bit like a brand – a highly symbolic thing that carries a value equation in the eye of the holder/beholder.

So what exactly is the point of having a charter system? Well, as with brands, a charter is a simple shorthand to represent an assortment of collective perceptions for customers. Numerous professions offer some form of chartered status that is often pitched to their membership base as a badge of pride and prestige, exclusivity and excellence. To the outside world, being ‘chartered’ is supposed to identify a member of a profession who possesses specific credentials and has gained a certain level of competence in their chosen field.

And so we have chartered accountants, chartered engineers and chartered surveyors. In the UK we also have chartered marketers, through the CIM.

In Australia, accountants can become a CPA through CPA Australia and marketers can become a CPM through the AMI.

 

What’s in it for me?

As with all pieces of paper, the trick is to ask what having it ultimately does for your career. What is the Return on Marketing Investment (ROMI) of being ‘chartered’ or being certified through CPM?! In other words, as an AMI member what do I get back from my $70 CPM application fee? (Or, if I’m a non-member, what do I get back from my combined $370 joining and CPM application fee?)

From a personal branding perspective, you’d hope a key deliverable is improved brand equity for the individual: by which I mean a higher and better profile with regard to awareness and positive associations.

But sticking a meaningful marketing metric on this can be tricky. How to measure the extent to which a marketer feels a warm and fuzzy glow from belonging to an elite group?

It would be so much easier if we had a more direct metric for ROMI. Wouldn’t it be nice, for example, if we could say that being chartered or certified leads to an instant five percent rise in base salary?!

I think some MBA schools have grasped this way of thinking when justifying MBA fees. They do a simple ‘before’ and ‘after’ comparison, that shows an MBA helps you to earn more money. I appreciate this is highly idealistic thinking. But a charter or certification needs a simple yet compelling hook, a proposition hard to argue against. I’m using a five percent pay rise as just one example!

 

You had me at ‘hello’

OK, so let’s assume that you’re a marketer and you like the idea of being certified or chartered. After all, it sends out a signal that you are a peak professional and not just a mere mortal member.

It’s one thing to be a member of a professional body, but another to be in the elite ranks. Being a master builder simply means you’re part of a paying club, not a stonemason extraordinaire. If you decide to apply for the AMI’s CPM program, you need to be committed to Continuing Professional Development (CPD). The AMI advises that all CPMs should undertake a minimum of 100 hours of professional development over a three-year period to foster their continued learning and development. That’s around 33 hours a year committed to your personal professional development, covering a diverse range of activities including training, workshops and conferences.

 

What role for educators? 

To become certified or chartered, a marketer must usually have a combination of credentials and then undergo a formal assessment of some sort. Desired credentials are usually several years’ marketing experience (often at management level) and, in addition, relevant (marketing) qualifications from an accredited educational organisation.

Educators can obviously help here with the qualifications component. They can also help with work placements, building strong ties with companies that employ freshly graduated marketing folk. Like all good leaders, I think these educators should lead by example by themselves being chartered or certified by their peak industry body (and perhaps earning five percent more as a result!)

 

What role for industry bodies? 

I think the key challenge for marketing industry bodies like the AMI and the CIM is ultimately one of brand building – they need to build the brand equity of chartered/certified programs.

And there are multiple target audiences here. It’s all very well for marketers to feel warm and fuzzy about their freshly minted piece of paper, but that’s unlikely to get them five percent more salary. One core focus should be on the employers of marketers – and their trusted advisers in recruitment consultancies and executive search firms. They are the ones we most need to be true believers.

The C-Suite wouldn’t dream of employing a finance person without a CPA or a legal counsel who hasn’t passed the Bar, so why would they hire a marketer without an equivalent standing?

Being certified or chartered should send a clear signal to the C-Suite: this person is a commercially-minded marketer who will strive to create sustainable growth for your organisation.

 

What role for recruiters? 

Senior marketers charged with hiring marketing professionals can help the chartered/certified cause. First of all, they can get certified themselves and in doing so lead by example.

If an aspiring marketer ultimately covets the boss’s job, knowing that the large fromage has chartered status or a CPM clearly sets them apart from the garden variety marketing boss.

In Australia, I’d like to see more job ads with ‘CPM candidates preferred’ on them. And I’d like to see recruiters screen for CPM as a matter of due diligence.

I think the ultimate marketing challenge is one of demand creation. There needs to be demand for certified marketers from those people charged with hiring marketers.

Demand and supply should settle in equilibrium.

Too much demand and not enough supply could result in asking prices (i.e. wages) being inflated for certified marketers. Although, as a CPM, I for one will not be one of those complaining.

Oversupply and under demand will devalue the whole process of being certified – after all, if nobody charged with hiring marketers really cares about CPM, then why should the marketers themselves?

The AMI has got a major role to play here in demand generation for CPM certification. It’s time to supersize the marketing efforts for marketing maestros.

Marketing education feature: The Researcher

This article is part 1 of 4 on marketing education and qualifications that first appeared in the June 2011 issue of Marketing magazine, comprising four perspectives: The Researcher, The Boss, The Educator/Practitioner and The Independent.

The Researcher

Thomas Brown is head of insights for the Chartered Institute of Marketing (CIM), where he heads up CIM’s industry professional development strategy and chartered accreditation, and leads a series of high profile benchmarking and research projects. A recognised thought leader in development of best practice in marketing capability, Brown regularly advises brand, marketing and capability leaders on world class marketing.

In April 2011, the Chartered Institute of Marketing celebrated its 100-year anniversary – a milestone reached at a time of much change for our institute and our profession. Some 15 years ago, we introduced the first continuing professional development (CPD) program for marketing – a scheme that, today, is followed by over 18,000 of our members, over 5000 of whom are certified as chartered marketers.

For the last 10 to 12 months, we’ve been in dialogue with a wide range of our stakeholders about marketing in the next century, and specifically the role of professional development and certification within this.

What’s needed from a professional development roadmap in a modern marketing team? Is there a role for certification in the 21st century? What do marketers need or aspire to as individuals, and how are they supported by their employers?

These are just a few of many ‘big questions’ we’ve been exploring with individuals and employers from all walks of life. Supported by the Australian Marketing Institute (AMI), the largest research study of its kind saw almost 8000 marketers worldwide take part, in order to help inform the answers to these questions. Here are some of the insights emerging from our research and our conversations with marketers.

 

Where to start?

It seems most logical to begin with employers. After all, it is businesses that create the demand for marketing and – therefore – competent and professionally developed individuals and teams.

Even before the recent global economic downturn, we saw a shift in how employers were approaching the development of marketing skills and talent. Conversations and plans were moving from tactical, ad hoc support (such as through one-off training courses or conferences) to a more considered investment in building skills and ability for the long-term.

Now, as organisations increasingly focus on growth, the question of how to build, nurture and sustain great marketing capability and talent is once again under the spotlight. Post-recession, we’re witnessing something of a renaissance of marketing playing an increasing role in helping a business to compete. What’s more, marketing leaders and teams themselves are operating against the backdrop of growing turbulence and change:

  • seismic shifts in the concept of ‘value’ – for businesses and consumers alike
  • increasing regulation, legislation and both governmental and societal scrutiny
  • an ever-more ‘marketing-savvy’ customer or consumer, and
  • an explosion in digital communications channels and marketing technologies.

These four issues are by no means exhaustive, but they do point to new challenges and a world of opportunity that only creates fresh talent and skills questions for employers.

 

Where to fish

What does a modern marketer look like? How strong is the talent pool that an employer has to fish in?

Our recent research provided an extraordinary insight into the make-up of today’s marketer. Some positive learnings emerged – for example, that more than eight out of 10 marketers have experience in other business functions – but other findings were more concerning.

Consider that almost half of marketers didn’t begin their career with the intention of working in marketing, and that over one-third don’t feel their career has matched up to their expectations.

What does this mean in practice? Well, in simple terms, if you’re in a team of 10 marketers, five of you didn’t plan to be there and three of you are getting what you wanted from your career. You can begin to see some of the challenges facing employers or recruiters:

  • how can we build consistency in foundation marketing skills, against such inconsistency in marketing as a career choice
  • how do we improve perceptions, expectations and education about what’s involved in marketing roles and careers, and
  • what do we need to change about our recruitment, development and performance management to make sure we attract and retain the right people in the right roles?

 

Fickle and disloyal?

Building on our insights into marketing careers, we also explored the intentions of marketers. Consider this:

  • fewer than 25 percent of marketers plan to rarely change employer during their career
  • at least half of marketers are planning for a career with multiple employers, in multiple industry sectors (in some sectors, this reaches 70 percent), and
  • some 25 percent of marketers intend to pursue a career within the same sector, but plan to work for multiple employers.

Put simply, around three-quarters of marketers plan for a reasonable amount of change and movement in their careers, and the majority plan to spend this time in multiple industry sectors.

On a positive note, this movement of talent should foster innovation and new thinking, as people and ideas are transferred not only between companies, but also across industries. It should also provide employers with a richer source of potential hires and a degree of flexibility as teams naturally evolve and move on.

It does, however, raise some slightly more serious questions. What will this do for the cost of hiring and replacing people and knowledge? Will employers continue to invest in their teams in the knowledge that 75 percent of them plan to take their skills to a competitor or different industry? How will businesses maintain common skills and language with such a diverse mix of talent, experience and backgrounds within a single team?

 

What do they really want?

It’s easy to assume that fame and money motivate most employees. In reality, today’s marketer has a more balanced set of goals and aspirations:

  • only four percent of marketers rank winning awards and recognition for their work as the number one priority in terms of their longer-term career aspirations
  • just 10 percent place reaching the post of marketing director as most important, and
  • almost half (48 percent) put either career satisfaction or work-life balance at the top of their list.

Given the realities of workload and the pace at which most marketers work, this challenges employers to ensure that the support, resource and incentives with which they manage their marketing teams is not aligned just to financial gain or career advancement. Rather, employers may need to consider other ways of developing and providing benefit to their marketers.

 

The imperatives for a professional body

Building on the insights developed within our recent research, we’re continuing to talk to our members and other stakeholders about the opportunities to evolve our approach to leading and supporting the professional development needs of marketers and teams. Here are some of the conversations we’re having in response to what we’ve learned:

  • Setting a standard – should we introduce a requirement for a proportion of mandatory development each year, undertaken by all members? Would this help?
  • One size doesn’t fit all – can one professional development program really work for a marketing graduate as well as an experienced chief marketing officer? Could we adopt a more segmented approach that sees CPD evolve as a marketer’s career stage, needs and aspirations change?
  • Employer engagement – how do we embed the concept of CPD within employers? Can we look to introduce company CPD programs for marketing teams and functions? Is there a role for the certification of an employer’s professional development commitments, as well as the individual’s?
  • Credibility among other professions – how can we improve the perception of marketing development and certification among professionals in other business disciplines (such as finance and accounting, legal, property etc)?

CIM offers new route to marketing masters

The Chartered Institute of Marketing (CIM), the world’s largest marketing body, now offers qualifications with advanced standing on masters programs at several leading universities.

Monash University and Swinburne University of Technology in Victoria have recently recognised the CIM’s postgraduate qualifications as being equivalent to half their masters in marketing. Marketers can now graduate with chartered status and the option to study at a top university with the maximum credit transfer possible.

Dr Dave Stewart, program director for the master’s of marketing at Monash, says:

“As the leader in the provision of marketing education in Australia, we are proud to be associated with the Chartered Institute of Marketing, whose qualifications are internationally recognised.”

The CIM was established in the UK nearly 100 years ago and now has 330 study centres in 60 countries around the globe, helping 55,000 marketers develop their careers every year. And the latest study centre to be accredited is here in Australia.

The Australian College of Marketing offers a range of CIM qualifications in Melbourne and Sydney. Emma Blackburn, the college’s principal, says:

“The great thing about the CIM is that their qualifications are designed and taught by practicing marketers in touch with the latest best practice and industry trends.”

Blackburn is also currently negotiating with Charles Sturt University, Australia’s leading provider of distance education. Charles Sturt is about to grant holders of CIM postgraduate qualifications advanced standing on their MBA and masters in marketing programs.

For more information about CIM qualifications and the Australian College of Marketing, visit www.acmarketing.com.au.

Graduate like a rock star #3: Network digitally

My career is certainly a big part of why I’m at uni. But I can’t say I put in nearly enough hours studying, participating in classes or even attending lectures. So when a careers night comes along, I’m normally one of the first to jump on board.

Or at least I used to be. After attending more than a few, you come to realise it is pretty much the same thing every time. If it’s an evening of presentations from industry leaders, they all repeat the same thing (unfortunately it’s none of the topics I’ll be covering in this series!). And if it’s a session of networking, you’re one of hundred other students all fighting for a two-minute conversation with the Google guys while the other brands stand around looking awkward. There’s even a few students who walk around collecting cards, probably so they can send their resume through the next morning. Don’t do that.

At least at a corporate cocktails type event there is a bar.

But that’s OK. You’re a passionate person who’s blogging, which means you’re ready to get your digital networking on.

The first thing you should do is register a LinkedIn account. If you’re not familiar with the setup, essentially LinkedIn lays all your networks out for you allowing you to see who’s connected within the industry. So if you really wanted to get into an agency you can look up the managing director on LinkedIn. You can then see which networks you both have in common. It might turn out that a lecturer of yours taught them and can set up a meeting. Or your old boss knows someone who knows someone who can put in a good word for you. It’s a bit like six degrees of separation.

Secondly, search the blogosphere. There’s a small chance that person you need to know has a blog. If so, fantastic. Drop some engaging and thought-provoking comments on their posts and become a regular reader and contributor. You’d be surprised how many bloggers are keen to catch up for a beer with one of their readers.

If the person you’re after doesn’t blog, maybe someone else at the agency or organisation does. Or perhaps they have a communal blog written by various people like most agencies do. You’d be surprised what a Google Blog Search can turn up.

Finally, Twitter is the other big player at the moment. It’s about to hit its tipping point, so get on board while you can still be considered an early adopter. Find out who are the big players in your field and follow them. Start small but slowly build up some conversation and see where it leads.

These three digital networking tools will hopefully be enough for you to stop you emailing your resume next time you find an agency or organisation you’re interested in.

Network digitally is the third article in the Graduate like a rock star.

eLearning start-up to help fill gaps

A new kid on the digital training block has raised its hand to help marketers get more of an understanding of digital media.

Patty Keegan has announced the launch of her digital media training company, Digital Chameleon. The company aims to offer collaborative e-learning components that can be provided as stand-alone training modules, or blended with traditional face-to-face instruction by Digital Chameleon trainers. It will offer six digital media courses that address the needs for companies that buy or sell advertising.

Despite the company launch coming at a time where start-ups face immense challenges, Keegan, believes early discussions have shown that the industry recognises the importance of digital media education and the need for accountable and cost effective training solutions.

During the early stages of the company’s development, Digital Chameleon has enlisted the help of an eLearning Advisory Board, consisting of sales and learning and development managers from client companies including Austereo and Fairfax Media.

“The market conditions and continued growth of the online market are resulting in an increasing number of staff shifting from traditional to digital media roles as. As a result we see a huge opportunity for media owners, agencies, and marketers to train their staff for the transition and ensure they are effective from day one,” says Keegan.

“Digital Chameleon e-learning modules are also exceptionally accountable and cost-effective, making them attractive to companies cutting back on travel and training costs.”

Considering the state of the current ad market, any kind of further education on digital media will be considered a golden opportunity for many.

Chartered Institute of Marketing (CIM) arrives in Australia

The Chartered Institute of Marketing (CIM), the world’s largest marketing body, has now made its internationally recognised qualifications available in Australia.

The CIM was established in the UK nearly 100 years ago and was awarded the Royal Charter in 1989. It now has 330 accredited study centres around the globe, helping 55,000 marketers develop their careers each year. And the latest study centre to be accredited by the CIM is right here in Australia.

The Australian College of Marketing is now filling places on a range of CIM qualifications. The college’s principal, Emma Blackburn, says:

“The great thing about the CIM is that their qualifications are designed and taught by practicing marketers in touch with the latest best practice and industry trends. CIM qualifications are more than just a line on your resume; they’re a gold-stamp of professional status that’s recognised around the globe.”

Ms Blackburn believes the CIM’s qualifications not only offer immediate professional development, but also offer marketers a pathway to chartered status and to further study. Monash University in Victoria, for example, rewards CIM qualifications with credit transfer to its masters of marketing program.

There are already a surprising number of industry leaders in Australia with CIM qualifications. One is Tim Cobb, general manager of marketing and PR at Aviva Australia, who says:

“I wouldnt have been able to progress to my current role without the sound grasp of marketing principles I gained through my CIM qualification. It gave me the strong understanding required to make the right long-term decisions and to earn the respect of colleagues in both marketing and other areas of business.”

Another is Julie Dormand, services director at MercerBell, an independent brand-response agency whose clients include the likes of MasterCard, NRMA, Toyota and Unicef. She says:

“My CIM Diploma gave me a greater understanding of the marketing discipline and helped me become more strategic.”

The Australian College of Marketing offers a full range of CIM qualifications – from introductory courses for those starting out in marketing, to strategic-level qualifications for more senior marketers.

According to Ms Blackburn, the qualifications have a strong vocational focus and are designed with the working professional in mind. All combine fully supported distance learning with face-to-face intensive study days, an approach that provides the flexibility required to fit study in around the demands of work and other commitments. Many also include workbased assignments, which add relevance by providing the opportunity to put theory into practice immediately.

For more information about CIM courses, please contact (03) 9867 7236, email info@australiancollegeofmarketing.com.au or visit www.australiancollegeofmarketing.com.au.

Other sources:

  • www.cim.co.uk