Child abuse campaign uses lenticular printing to hide its message from adults

A new campaign for a child welfare organisation The ANAR (Aid to Children and Adolescents at Risk) Foundation in Spain has created an advertisement that can only be seen by children.

Anyone under four feet, three inches can see bruising on a child’s face in the poster, along with ANAR’s hotline number and copy that reads, ‘If somebody hurts you, phone us and we’ll help you.’

Anyone taller can simply see the child without the bruise and the line. ‘Sometimes child abuse is only visible to the child suffering it.’

 

 

 

 

 

 

Post-GFC talent retainment

So far I’ve written about citybranding. We know that it is an emergent topic that involves large amounts of thought and practice in the field of communication. And we know that the need for cities to carefully brand themselves comes from the way capital and talent move in a globalised world. Today’s post is about the fact that, in my opinion, it all entails essential communicational changes inside companies.

The credit crunch may have slowed down that movement to a considerable extent, but before the crisis I was already amazed when seeing how talent flew from one place to another, from one company to another. Many friends and acquaintances of mine, single or married, took on the challenge of leaving Barcelona to work in the US, or changed job once every year on average. It wasn’t only people working in IT. The professional profiles ranged from that to business management, publishing, industrial production…

At some point I even wrote an editorial about it in our magazine Comunicas? (translation: Do You Communicate?)but through the lenses of quite a well-known book. You probably have read The Human Factor by Graham Greene. I asked the reader to allow me to spoil the reading by disclosing the ending. In the novel, a man finds himself before a dicotomy in his priorities. He has to chose between being completely faithful to his family or betraying his own country. The situation is especially meaningful because he works in the Foreign Office. His country is both his employer and his social community, all at once – and he betrays it for the sake of being true and loyal to his family.

Outstanding professionals are ultimately more loyal to their professional and personal priorities than to those of the company that employs them. Hence their continuous flight. As I said before, the credit crunch may have slowed down that movement to a considerable extent… but after the crisis, talent will fly again, and even more so.

These dynamics will be reinforced by two important factors. First, it is obvious that among the developed countries, economies emerging and moving away from the crisis will be the ones that best reward talent. On April 8 in Barcelona, European commissioner Androulla Vassiliou said that one in every three new jobs created in the EU between now and 2020 will be a highly-qualified working position.

Second, dynamics such as the competition among cities (read my blogposts on enjoyable Barcelona or pleasant Paris and their governments’ will to boost a knowledge-based economy) will give further reasons for outstanding professionals to fly and give new places a try.

The answer to that phenomenon or, say, to the risk of excellent professionals leaving our companies, lies in the area of internal communication. Managing people means being aware of what their professional concerns and challenges are, and it even means having a glimpse at what those concerns and challenges are at the personal stage. Graham Greene’s book has it that the mismatch between those issues is the reason for the flight, meaning the escape, of the novel’s main characters.

I hear, for instance, that 70% of women end up leaving their professional area of expertise between the age of 30 and 40. The main reason is maternity. Lack of corporate planning and support force them abandon the boat after their maternity leave: an unbearable loss of talent which costs a fortune to both employers and employees. Fortunately initiatives such as maternity coaching are becoming more frequent and allow a ‘maternity transition’ that avoids both business and career disruption.

So we’re talking about a cultural change in business organizations that the Anglo-Saxon economies have addressed a lot more than we have in Europe and in Spain. Generally, Human Resource departments have transformed themselves from being a mere administrative unit to assessing each department leader for the sake of intellectual and human capital management…

…but have they, really? That’s what the usual quote from Dave Ulrich is all about: “HR must give value”. It was a need in the field of internal communication before the crisis, but it will especially make a difference after the credit crunch.

Speak soon,
Pau

Do cities speak 2.0?

“As the pool of Foreign Direct Investment shrinks, there will be more competition for fewer projects.”

A quote from the ‘Global Investment Promotion Benchmarking 2009’ (GIPB) by the World Bank Group. In my first post I said that globalization puts forward the need for cities to characterise themselves more carefully in order to attract business, investment and talent. But as the quote above shows, the need to stand out as a distinctive destination derives from the economic downturn as well.

The World Bank benchmarking shows companies’ impressions when sketching a first list of possible destinations to invest in. The GIPB focuses on the information given to foreign companies by government-led websites devoted to promoting each country or region economically.

One of its main conclusions is 70% of these intermediaries miss out on potential investment (and job-creation). But there is more: despite the fact that rich countries from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development have better scores, centers of excellence are emerging in all regions.

Countries with medium incomes like Colombia, Lithuania or Turkey have quite outstanding performances and make it to the higher end of the ranking, which has traditionally been occupied by agencies such as the Irish Industrial Development Agency, the British UK Trade & Investment or the Invest in Sweden Agency.

The screen, be it a computer or a cell-phone, makes us equal. In the internet, a small budget can bring about an unbeatable brand perception and thus overcome the efforts of any governmental agency with great resources for its marketing campaigns.

The important progress made in 2.0 promotion by countries that are not global leaders is a lesson for cities.

In my first post, I said that according to the European Cities Monitor (which annually assesses which European cities are best for business), Barcelona is the fourth city in terms of self-promotion.

And it was in Barcelona, at the ESADE business school headquarters, that we at Grupo BPMO presented the survey ‘Visibility of cities in Web 2.0’ in March 2009. We wanted to assess to what extent new technologies were being used in the Spanish cities’ communication and marketing strategies. We found that the majority of them were still limited to a traditional approach. Their websites looked more focused on design than on increasing the visibility of the city among search engines results:

  • 38% had a virtual press room
  • 8% enabled visitors and citizens to start a conversation
  • 38% published videos on Youtube
  • 31% had used Wikipedia as a promotional tool, and
  • 15% offered RSS…

Let me speak about Madrid, not only of Barcelona, so that I am not accused of being too partial. Madrid is aware of the panorama we are talking about as its state-of-the-art multimedia platform (esMADRID) shows. It includes different promotional channels such as the multilingual portal esMADRID.com, with a multilingual digital TV and a social network.

It seems that cities are starting to get moving and adapt to the new times. But it also seems that many of them still lack a lot 2.0 vocabulary, nowadays you cannot go very far without it.

Speak soon, Pau

First time US brand beats Oz

FutureBrand’s Country Brand Index (CBI) has rated the US number one country brand for 2009.

Australia held the top spot for the past three years, but slipped to third place in 2009 behind Canada, host of the 2010 Winter Olympics. Continuing the neighbourly correlation, New Zealand took fourth place.

FutureBrand suggest the ‘Obama effect’ is behind the US’ rise, the first time the country has taken first place in the index’s history. The company also suggest Australia has benefited from ‘The Best Job in the World’ campaign and Baz Luhrmann’s Australia – explaining the drop in place with the move toward ‘value travel’ and staycationing.

“After three years in the number one position, a remarkable achievement by any measure, this new development was just a matter of time. The measurable decline of some key attributes, combined with the revitalisation of Brand USA, has resulted in the effect on Australia’s ranking. It highlights the importance of keeping a country brand fresh, relevant and engaging – no small challenge in a highly competitive international marketplace.” said Tim Riches, CEO FutureBrand Singapore and growth officer, Asia-Pacific.

Australia remains the country most people have on their wish list to visit, live in and/or extend a business trip in.

The days of countries marketing themselves with travel posters are over. Wise governments harness, propel and amplify their country as a brand, given it also encompasses culture, exports retail, real estate and of course tax revenue. The popular phrase says ‘tourism is too big to fail,’ but if no one is paying attention or if it is undervalued or taken for granted, the competition will benefit,” said Rene A. Mack, president, Weber Shandwick Travel & Lifestyle Practice.

CBI Top Country Brands

  1. United States
  2. Canada
  3. Australia
  4. New Zealand
  5. France
  6. Italy
  7. Japan
  8. United Kingdom
  9. Germany
  10. Spain