iSnack 2.0 joke in poor taste

According to an online poll conducted by BCM, the majority of people surveyed (more than three in four) believe that the recent Vegemite iSnack 2.0 naming and subsequent plan to change it by parent company Kraft, was nothing more than a ploy to maximise exposure for the new product.

The BCM poll, which surveyed over 1,250 respondents, revealed that more than 75% of participants believe that it was a carefully crafted media publicity stunt.

This is despite a statement from Kraft specifically denying this was ever their intention.

“We conducted the survey because many industry insiders were debating whether the name was a cheap grab to gain publicity. We thought it would be interesting to know what the public thought. We now know overwhelmingly that people considered it a stunt,” explained BCM agency partner, Kevin Moreland.

Blogs and forums all over the internet have been buzzing with consumers indicating the name must be a joke, suggesting it was un-Australian and that it failed to connect with Gen Y – the audience it was intended to attract.

“It would seem that people simply couldn’t accept that iSnack 2.0 was ever a serious contender as a name. People assumed therefore that Kraft must have carefully planned the marketing to maximise publicity. More than anything, the study sends a clear message to marketers about the lack of trust consumers have for many brands and how cynically they view the marketing community,” asserted Moreland.

Punters suggest Vegefail

The unveiling of the new Vegemite’s name almost eclipsed the AFL Grand Final over the weekend and polarised Australians.

Kraft launched a campaign calling for Australians to name their new product, which received more than 40,000 entries. The winner, ‘iSnack 2.0’, was chosen, it has been claimed, to align the new product with a younger market and tap into the credentials of Apple’s iPod. The move aligns historically with the brand, as the original spread was named through a public contest held in the 1920s.

Dean Robbins, a West Australian web designer, won the contest, saying:

Its been difficult to contain my excitement; I actually leapt out of my chair when I heard the news. To think that I could go down in Australias history is overwhelming.

The online backlash was overwhelming, with #Vegefail rising to one of the most discussed topics worldwide on Twitter. One popular retweet mocked the name’s incohesiveness with Australian national culture:

“I said do you speak-a my language?/She just smiled and gave me an iSnack 2.0 sandwich”.

Academics have also joined the dissent.

“The name doesn’t actually capture the new product or say anything particularly meaningful about it,” said, RMIT professor of marketing, Con Stavros. “Putting an ‘i’ in front of a word is somewhat unoriginal, while adding ‘2.0’ is possibly confusing.”

“Credit should go to Kraft for generating such a high level of interest in their new product. But considering they apparently had tens of thousands of suggestions for a name for this new type of Vegemite, I’m surprised this is the one idea that came out on top,” continued Stavros.